Google Updated Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam Questions and Answers by saint

AutoML Vision Edge is a service that allows you to create custom image classification and object detection models that can run on edge devices, such as mobile phones, tablets, or IoT devices1. AutoML Vision Edge offers four types of models that vary in size, accuracy, and latency: mobile-versatile-1, mobile-low-latency-1, mobile-high-accuracy-1, and mobile-core-ml-low-latency-12. Each model has its own trade-offs and use cases, depending on the device specifications and the application requirements.

For the use case of building an ML model to reduce the amount of time spent by quality control inspectors checking for product defects, the best model to use is the AutoML Vision Edge mobile-low-latency-1 model. This model is optimized for fast inference on mobile devices, with a latency of less than 50 milliseconds on a Pixel 1 phone2. Faster defect detection is a priority for the toy manufacturer, and the factory does not have reliable Wi-Fi, so a low-latency model that can run on the device without internet connection is ideal. The mobile-low-latency-1 model also has a small size of less than 4 MB, which makes it easy to deploy and update2. The mobile-low-latency-1 model has a slightly lower accuracy than the mobile-high-accuracy-1 model, but it is still suitable for most image classification tasks2. Therefore, the AutoML Vision Edge mobile-low-latency-1 model is the best option for this use case.

References:

• AutoML Vision Edge documentation
• AutoML Vision Edge model types

According to the web search results, Vertex AI Pipelines is a serverless orchestrator for running ML pipelines, using either the KFP SDK or TFX1. Vertex AI Pipelines provides a set of prebuilt components that can be used to perform common ML tasks, such as training, evaluation, deployment, and more2. Vertex AI ModelEvaluationOp and ModelDeployOp are two such components that can be used to evaluate and deploy a model to an endpoint for online inference3. However, Vertex AI Pipelines does not provide a prebuilt component for hyperparameter tuning. Therefore, to have control over how the model parameters are tuned, you need to use a custom component that calls the Vertex AI HyperparameterTuningJob service4. Therefore, option A is the best way to decide which Google Cloud pipeline components to use for the given use case, as it includes a custom component for hyperparameter tuning, and prebuilt components for model evaluation and deployment. The other options are not relevant or optimal for this scenario. References:

• Vertex AI Pipelines
• Google Cloud Pipeline Components
• Vertex AI ModelEvaluationOp and ModelDeployOp
• Vertex AI HyperparameterTuningJob
• Google Professional Machine Learning Certification Exam 2023
• Latest Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Actual Free Exam Questions

 Prediction drift is the change in the distribution of feature values or labels over time. It can affect the performance and accuracy of the model, and may require retraining or redeploying the model. Vertex AI Model Monitoring allows you to monitor prediction drift on your deployed models and endpoints, and set up alerts and notifications when the drift exceeds a certain threshold. You can specify an email address to receive the notifications, and use the information to retrigger the training pipeline and deploy an updated version of your model. This is the most direct and convenient way to achieve your goal. References:

• Vertex AI Model Monitoring
• Monitoring prediction drift
• Setting up alerts and notifications

• Option A is incorrect because creating a collaborative filtering system that recommends articles to a user based on the user’s past behavior is not the best approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they are currently reading. Collaborative filtering is a method of recommendation that uses the ratings or preferences of other users to predict the preferences of a target user1. However, this method does not consider the content or features of the articles, and may not be able to find articles that are similar in terms of topic, style, or sentiment.
• Option B is correct because encoding all articles into vectors using word2vec, and building a model that returns articles based on vector similarity is a suitable approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they are currently reading. Word2vec is a technique that learns low-dimensional and dense representations of words from a large corpus of text, such that words that are semantically similar have similar vectors2. By applying word2vec to the articles, we can obtain vector representations of the articles that capture their meaning and usage. Then, we can use a similarity measure, such as cosine similarity, to find articles that have similar vectors to the current article3.
• Option C is incorrect because building a logistic regression model for each user that predicts whether an article should be recommended to a user is not a feasible approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they are currently reading. Logistic regression is a supervised learning method that models the probability of a binary outcome (such as recommend or not) based on some input features (such as user profile or article content)4. However, this method requires a large amount of labeled data for each user, which may not be available or scalable. Moreover, this method does not directly measure the similarity between articles, but rather the likelihood of a user’s preference.
• Option D is incorrect because manually labeling a few hundred articles, and then training an SVM classifier based on the manually classified articles that categorizes additional articles into their respective categories is not an effective approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they are currently reading. SVM (support vector machine) is a supervised learning method that finds a hyperplane that separates the data into different classes (such as news categories) with the maximum margin5. However, this method also requires a large amount of labeled data, which may be costly and time-consuming to obtain. Moreover, this method does not account for the fine-grained similarity between articles within the same category, or the cross-category similarity between articles from different categories.

References:

• Collaborative filtering
• Word2vec
• Cosine similarity
• Logistic regression
• SVM