Isaca Updated CISM Exam Questions and Answers by lee

= The allocation of resources during a security incident response depends on the defined levels of severity, which indicate the potential impact and urgency of the incident. The levels of severity help prioritize the response activities and assign the appropriate roles and responsibilities. Senior management commitment, a business continuity plan (BCP), and an established escalation process are important factors for an effective incident response, but they do not directly determine the allocation of resources. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 3011; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 1462

Learn more:

1. isaca.org2. amazon.com3. gov.uk

Defined levels of severity is the best determinant of the allocation of resources during a security incident response. Having defined levels of severity allows organizations to plan for and allocate resources for each level of incident, depending on the severity of the incident. This ensures that the right resources are allocated in a timely manner and that incidents are addressed appropriately.

= The best way to enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance is to establish an information security steering committee with business representation. An information security steering committee is a group of senior executives and managers from different business units and functions who are responsible for overseeing, directing, and supporting the information security program and strategy of the organization. An information security steering committee with business representation can enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance by providing the following benefits12:

Align the information security objectives and priorities with the business objectives and priorities, and ensure that the information security program and strategy support and enable the achievement of the organizational goals and performance.

Communicate and promote the value and importance of information security to the board of directors, senior management, and other stakeholders, and ensure that information security is considered and incorporated in the decision making and planning processes of the organization.

Provide guidance and direction to the information security manager and the information security team, and ensure that they have the necessary authority, resources, and support to implement and maintain the information security program and strategy effectively and efficiently.

Monitor and evaluate the performance and outcomes of the information security program and strategy, and ensure that they are aligned with the expectations and requirements of the organization and its stakeholders, as well as the relevant laws, regulations, standards, and best practices.

Identify and address the issues, challenges, and opportunities related to information security, and ensure that the information security program and strategy are continuously improved and updated to reflect the changes and developments in the internal and external environment.

The other options are not the best way to enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance, as they are less comprehensive, effective, or influential than establishing an information security steering committee with business representation. Well-documented information security policies and standards are important components of the information security program and strategy, but they are not sufficient to enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance, as they may not reflect or align with the business needs, priorities, or expectations, and they may not be communicated, implemented, or enforced properly or consistently across the organization. Clear lines of authority across the organization are important factors for the information security governance structure, but they are not sufficient to enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance, as they may not ensure the involvement, participation, or support of the senior executives, managers, and other stakeholders who are responsible for or affected by information security. Senior management approval of the information security strategy is an important outcome of the information security governance process, but it is not sufficient to enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance, as it may not ensure the alignment, communication, or monitoring of the information security strategy with the business strategy, and it may not ensure the accountability, responsibility, or authority of the information security manager and the information security team12. References = CISM Domain 1: Information Security Governance (ISG) [2022 update], Information Security Governance for CISM® | Pluralsight, Aligning Information Security with Business Strategy - ISACA, Aligning Information Security with Business Objectives - ISACA

= The best way to ensure that the disaster recovery plan (DRP) can be carried out in an emergency is to provide annual disaster recovery training to the appropriate staff, such as the disaster recovery team, the business process owners, and the IT staff. Disaster recovery training is a process of educating and preparing the staff for their roles, responsibilities, and actions in the event of a disaster that affects the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of the information assets and systems that support the business processes and functions. Disaster recovery training can help to ensure that the staff are aware, capable, and confident to execute the DRP, as well as to minimize the impact and damage to the business continuity, reputation, and value. Disaster recovery training can also help to evaluate the adequacy, accuracy, and applicability of the DRP, as well as to identify and address any gaps, weaknesses, or errors that could hinder or compromise the disaster recovery process. Disaster recovery training can also help to document and report the training details, activities, and outcomes, and to provide feedback and recommendations for improvement and optimization of the DRP and the training process.

Storing disaster recovery documentation in a public cloud, maintaining an outsourced contact center in another country, and requiring disaster recovery documentation be stored with all key decision makers are all possible ways to ensure the availability and accessibility of the DRP in an emergency, but they are not the best ones. Storing disaster recovery documentation in a public cloud is a process of using a third-party service provider to store and manage the DRP documents online, which can offer benefits such as scalability, flexibility, and cost-efficiency, but also risks such as data breach, data loss, or service disruption. Maintaining an outsourced contact center in another country is a process of using a third-party service provider to handle the communication and coordination of the disaster recovery process with the internal and external stakeholders, such as the customers, partners, or regulators, which can offer benefits such as redundancy, reliability, and expertise, but also risks such as cultural, legal, or contractual issues. Requiring disaster recovery documentation be stored with all key decision makers is a process of ensuring that the senior management and the business process owners have a copy of the DRP documents, which can offer benefits such as accountability, authority, and visibility, but also risks such as inconsistency, duplication, or unauthorized access. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 233-2341; CISM Practice Quiz, question 1602

 Residual risk is the risk that remains after implementing controls to mitigate the inherent risk. A reduction in residual risk indicates that the information security program is effective in managing the risks to an acceptable level. This would best justify the continued investment in the program, as it demonstrates the value and benefits of the security activities. Security framework alignment, speed of implementation, and industry peer benchmarking are not direct measures of the effectiveness or value of the information security program. They may be useful for comparison or compliance purposes, but they do not necessarily reflect the impact of the program on the risk profile of the organization. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 431; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 622Residual risk is the remaining risk after all security controls have been implemented. It is important to measure the residual risk of an organization in order to determine the effectiveness of the security program and to justify continued investment in the program. A reduction in residual risk is an indication that the security program is effective and that continued investment is warranted.