Isaca Updated CISM Exam Questions and Answers by eddison

The ultimate responsibility for ensuring the objectives of an information security framework are being met belongs to the board of directors, as they are accountable for the governance of the organization and the oversight of the information security strategy. The board of directors should ensure that the information security framework aligns with the business objectives, supports the business processes, and complies with the legal and regulatory requirements. The board of directors should also monitor the performance and effectiveness of the information security framework and provide guidance and direction for its improvement.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Enterprise Governance, Subsection: Board of Directors, Page 18.

Eradication is the phase of incident response where the incident team removes the threat from the affected systems and restores them to a secure state. If this phase is not successful, the malware may persist or reappear on the systems, causing further damage or compromise. Therefore, eradication is the correct answer.

References:

https://www.securitymetrics.com/blog/6-phases-incident-response-plan

https://www.atlassian.com/incident-management/incident-response

https://eccouncil.org/cybersecurity-exchange/incident-handling/what-is-incident-response-life-cycle/

Including the impact of the risk as part of regular metrics is the best way for the information security manager to help senior management understand the related risk of having many user workstations with unpatched versions of software because it quantifies and communicates the potential consequences and likelihood of such a risk in terms of business objectives and performance indicators. Recommending the security steering committee conduct a review is not a good way because it does not provide any specific information or analysis about the risk or its impact. Updating the risk assessment at regular intervals is not a good way because it does not ensure that senior management is aware or informed about the risk or its impact. Sending regular notifications directly to senior managers is not a good way because it may be perceived as intrusive or annoying, and may not convey the severity or urgency of the risk or its impact. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2015/volume-6/measuring-the-value-of-information-security-investments https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-3/how-to-measure-the-effectiveness-of-your-information-security-management-system