Isaca Updated CISM Exam Questions and Answers by yaseen

According to the NIST SP 800-61 Computer Security Incident Handling Guide1, the first step in responding to a cybersecurity incident is to invoke the incident response plan (IRP), which is a written document that defines the roles, responsibilities, and procedures for dealing with a confirmed or suspected security breach1. The IRP helps the organization to prepare for, detect, analyze, contain, eradicate, recover from, and learn from incidents1. Invoking the IRP ensures that the right personnel and resources are mobilized to effectively deal with the threat and minimize the impact.

References = 1: NIST SP 800-61: 1. Introduction1

 A security information and event management (SIEM) system is a tool that collects, analyzes, and correlates security events from various sources, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, antivirus software, and other devices. A SIEM system can provide real-time alerts, dashboards, reports, and forensic analysis of security incidents. The greatest value of a SIEM system is that it can facilitate the monitoring of risk occurrences by identifying anomalies, trends, patterns, and indicators of compromise that may otherwise go unnoticed. A SIEM system can also help with incident response, compliance, and audit activities by providing evidence and documentation of security events.

References =

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, page 2291

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, 2020, question ID 2082

The greatest value provided by a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system is facilitating the monitoring of risk occurrences. SIEM systems collect, analyze and alert on security-related data from various sources such as firewall logs, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and system logs. This allows organizations to identify security threats in real-time and respond quickly, helping to mitigate potential harm to their systems and data.

= Establishing an information security strategy committee is the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program because it involves the participation and collaboration of key stakeholders from different business functions and levels who can provide input, guidance, and endorsement for the security program. An information security strategy committee is a governance body that oversees the development, implementation, and maintenance of the security program and aligns it with the organization’s strategic objectives, risk appetite, and culture. An information security strategy committee can help to obtain support for the security program by:

Communicating the vision, mission, and goals of the security program to the organization and demonstrating its value and benefits.

Establishing roles and responsibilities for the security program and ensuring accountability and ownership.

Securing adequate resources and budget for the security program and allocating them appropriately.

Resolving conflicts and issues that may arise during the security program execution and ensuring alignment with other business processes and initiatives.

Monitoring and evaluating the performance and effectiveness of the security program and ensuring continuous improvement and adaptation.

Benchmarking against similar industry organizations is a useful technique to compare and improve the security program, but it is not the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. Benchmarking involves measuring and analyzing the security program’s processes, practices, and outcomes against those of other organizations that have similar characteristics, objectives, or challenges. Benchmarking can help to identify gaps, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the security program and to adopt best practices and standards that can enhance the security program’s performance and maturity. However, benchmarking alone does not guarantee the support or acceptance of the security program by the organization, as it may not reflect the organization’s specific needs, risks, or culture.

Delivering an information security awareness campaign is a vital component of the security program, but it is not the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. An information security awareness campaign is a set of activities and initiatives that aim to educate and inform the organization’s workforce and other relevant parties about the security program’s policies, standards, procedures, and guidelines, as well as the security risks, threats, and incidents that may affect the organization. An information security awareness campaign can help to increase the security knowledge, skills, and behaviors of the organization’s members and to foster a security risk-aware culture. However, an information security awareness campaign is not sufficient to obtain support for the security program, as it may not address the strategic, operational, or financial aspects of the security program or the expectations and interests of the different stakeholders.

Publishing an information security RACI chart is a helpful tool to define and communicate the security program’s roles and responsibilities, but it is not the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. A RACI chart is a matrix that assigns the level of involvement and accountability for each task or activity in the security program to each role or stakeholder. RACI stands for Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed, which are the four possible levels of participation. A RACI chart can help to clarify the expectations, obligations, and authority of each role or stakeholder in the security program and to avoid duplication, confusion, or conflict. However, a RACI chart does not ensure the support or commitment of the roles or stakeholders for the security program, as it may not address the benefits, challenges, or resources of the security program or the feedback and input of the roles or stakeholders. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 97-98, 103-104, 107-108, 111-112

Information Security Governance: Guidance for Boards of Directors and Executive Management, 2nd Edition - ISACA1

Information Security Strategy: The Key to Success - ISACA2

Deliver an information security awareness campaign is the BEST approach to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. An information security awareness campaign is a great way to raise awareness of the importance of information security and the impact it can have on an organization. It helps to ensure that all stakeholders understand the importance of information security and are aware of the risks associated with it. Additionally, an effective awareness campaign can help to ensure that everyone in the organization is aware of the cybersecurity policies, procedures, and best practices that must be followed.

= The primary objective of performing a post-incident review is to identify the root cause of the incident, which is the underlying factor or condition that enabled or facilitated the occurrence of the incident. Identifying the root cause helps to understand the nature and origin of the incident, and to prevent or mitigate similar incidents in the future. A post-incident review also aims to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the incident response process, identify lessons learned and best practices, and recommend improvements for the incident management policies, procedures, controls, and tools. However, these are secondary objectives that depend on the identification of the root cause as the first step.

Re-evaluating the impact of incidents is not the primary objective of performing a post-incident review, as it is already done during the incident response process. The impact of incidents is the extent and severity of the damage or harm caused by the incident to the organization’s assets, operations, reputation, or stakeholders. Re-evaluating the impact of incidents may be part of the post-incident review, but it is not the main goal.

Identifying vulnerabilities is not the primary objective of performing a post-incident review, as it is also done during the incident response process. Vulnerabilities are weaknesses or flaws in the system or network that can be exploited by attackers to compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the information or resources. Identifying vulnerabilities may be part of the post-incident review, but it is not the main goal.

Identifying control improvements is not the primary objective of performing a post-incident review, as it is a result of the root cause analysis. Controls are measures or mechanisms that are implemented to protect the system or network from threats, reduce risks, or ensure compliance with policies and standards. Identifying control improvements is an important outcome of the post-incident review, but it is not the main goal. References =

ISACA CISM: PRIMARY goal of a post-incident review should be to?

CISM Exam Overview - Vinsys

CISM Review Manual, Chapter 4, page 176

CISM Exam Content Outline | CISM Certification | ISACA, Domain 4, Task 4.3