Isaca Updated CISM Exam Questions and Answers by noa

= Reevaluation of risk is a vital aspect of the risk management process that helps organizations to identify and analyze new or evolving threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts on their assets, and implement the necessary controls to mitigate them. Reevaluation of risk is most critical when there is a change in the threat landscape, which refers to the external and internal factors that influence the likelihood and severity of potential attacks on the organization’s information assets. A change in the threat landscape may be caused by various factors, such as technological innovations, geopolitical events, cybercrime trends, regulatory changes, or organizational changes. A change in the threat landscape may introduce new risks or alter the existing risk profile of the organization, requiring a reassessment of the risk appetite, tolerance, and strategy. Reevaluation of risk helps the organization to adapt to the changing threat landscape and ensure that the information security program remains effective, efficient, and aligned with the business objectives.

References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 1131

CISM Domain 2: Information Risk Management (IRM) [2022 update]2

Reevaluation of Risk | CISM Exam Question Answer | ISACA3

 A detailed incident notification process is most important to include in an incident response plan to ensure incidents are responded to by the appropriate individuals. The incident notification process defines the roles and responsibilities of the incident response team members, the escalation procedures, the communication channels, the reporting requirements, and the stakeholders to be informed. The incident notification process helps to ensure that the right people are involved in the incident response, that the incident is handled in a timely and efficient manner, and that the relevant information is shared with the appropriate parties. Skills required for the incident response team, a list of external resources to assist with incidents, and service level agreements (SLAs) are also important elements of an incident response plan, but they are not as critical as the incident notification process. Skills required for the incident response team describe the competencies and qualifications of the team members, but they do not specify who should be notified or involved in the incident response. A list of external resources to assist with incidents provides a directory of external parties that can provide support or expertise in the incident response, but it does not define the criteria or process for engaging them. Service level agreements (SLAs) define the expectations and obligations of the service providers and the service recipients in the incident response, but they do not detail the steps or procedures for notifying or escalating incidents. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, pages 191-1921; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 662

Information owners are responsible for determining the initial recovery time objective (RTO) for their information assets and processes, as they are the ones who understand the business requirements and impact of a disruption. An external consultant may assist in conducting the business impact analysis (BIA), but does not have the authority to decide the RTO. An information security manager may provide input on the security aspects of the RTO, but does not have the business perspective to determine the RTO. A business continuity coordinator may facilitate the BIA process and ensure the alignment of the RTO with the business continuity plan, but does not have the ownership of the information assets and processes. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 202.

When performing a business impact analysis (BIA), it is the responsibility of the business continuity coordinator to determine the initial recovery time objective (RTO). The RTO is a critical component of the BIA and should be determined in cooperation with the information owners. The RTO should reflect the maximum tolerable period of disruption (MTPD) and should be used to guide the development of the recovery strategy.

Unexpected outcomes may arise in production when using only sanitized data for the testing of applications. Sanitized data is data that has been purposely and permanently deleted or modified to prevent unauthorized access or misuse. Sanitized data may not reflect the real characteristics, patterns, or behaviors of the original data, and thus may not be suitable for testing applications that rely on data quality and accuracy. According to NIST, data sanitization methods can affect the usability of data for testing purposes1. The other options are not risks introduced by using sanitized data for testing applications, but rather risks that can be mitigated by using sanitized data. Data loss, data disclosure, and breaches of compliance obligations are possible consequences of using unsanitized data that contains sensitive or confidential information. References: 2: What is Data Sanitization? | Data Erasure Methods | Imperva 3: Data sanitization techniques: Standards, practices, legislation 1: Data sanitization – Wikipedia