Isaca Updated CGEIT Exam Questions and Answers by tom

 The frequency of IT services risk profile updates is a metric that measures how often the IT organization assesses and updates the risks associated with its services. This metric is useful to ensure that IT services meet business requirements, as it helps to identify and mitigate potential threats and vulnerabilities that could affect the availability, performance, reliability, and security of the services. A high frequency of IT services risk profile updates indicates that the IT organization is proactive and responsive to changing business needs and expectations. A low frequency of IT services risk profile updates suggests that the IT organization is reactive and complacent, and may not be aware of or prepared for emerging risks that could impact the business. References := Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance - ISACA, The 8 IT service management metrics that matter most

Thebest governance-aligned approachis toseek input from appropriate stakeholders, including community representatives, environmental groups, and local government. This enables the organization to address concerns proactively and collaboratively, minimizing reputational and regulatory risks.

Waiting for complaints or making unilateral decisions (like buying land or reducing hours) may be less effective or even inappropriate without stakeholder input.

This is because moving all IT applications to an external SaaS cloud provider means that the organization is outsourcing the development, deployment, maintenance, and operation of its IT applications to a third-party vendor. This implies that the organization is relinquishing some control and ownership over its IT applications, and relying on the vendor to provide the required functionality, performance, quality, and security1. Therefore, the organization needs to shift its focus from delivering IT services internally to managing IT services externally. This involves the following activities2:

Establishing and maintaining a clear and comprehensive contract or service level agreement (SLA) with the SaaS vendor that defines the roles, responsibilities, expectations, and outcomes of both parties2

Monitoring and measuring the SaaS vendor’s compliance with the contract or SLA, and ensuring that the vendor meets the agreed service levels, standards, and metrics2

Communicating and collaborating with the SaaS vendor regularly, and resolving any issues, conflicts, or changes that may arise during the service delivery2

Evaluating and improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the SaaS vendor’s service delivery, and identifying and implementing any opportunities for innovation or optimization2

Managing the risks and challenges associated with outsourcing IT services to a SaaS vendor, such as data privacy, security, availability, compatibility, integration, dependency, cost, and performance issues2

The shift from service delivery to service management can have a significant impact on the IT governance framework, processes, policies, and practices of the organization. It can also affect the IT skills, roles, and responsibilities of the IT staff and stakeholders. Therefore, the organization needs to adapt and adjust its IT governance approach accordingly to ensure that it can effectively oversee and optimize its IT services in a SaaS environment3.

The other options, the integration of the IT department with business lines, the improvement of IT service alignment with business, and the necessity to update key risk indicators (KRIs) are not as significant as the shift from service delivery to service management for moving all IT applications to an external SaaS cloud provider from an IT governance perspective. They are more related to the outcomes or consequences of moving to a SaaS environment, rather than the impact or change itself. They may also not be unique or specific to a SaaS environment, as they may apply to other types or models of IT service delivery as well.

This is because KPIs are measurable values that indicate how well the IT governance framework is achieving its objectives and delivering value to the business1. By evaluating KPI results, the organization can:

Monitor and review the IT governance framework’s progress, performance, quality, and outcomes

Highlight the IT governance framework’s achievements, challenges, and opportunities

Demonstrate the alignment of the IT governance framework with the business strategy, goals, and priorities

Provide recommendations and feedback for the IT governance framework’s improvement and adjustment

Evaluating KPI results can provide a comprehensive and objective overview of the IT governance framework’s effectiveness and impact.

The other options, developing a business case for the program portfolio, benchmarking the IT governance framework to industry best practice, and reviewing results of IT audit reports are not as effective as evaluating KPI results for assessing the effectiveness of a newly established IT governance framework. They are more related to the design and implementation of the IT governance framework, rather than its evaluation. They may also be too narrow or subjective for assessing the IT governance framework’s effectiveness, as they may not cover all aspects or perspectives of the IT governance framework. They may also depend on external factors or standards that may not be relevant or applicable to the organization’s specific context and needs.