Isaca Updated CGEIT Exam Questions and Answers by zackary

The best long-term solution to address the concern regarding loss of experienced staff is to implement knowledge management practices, because knowledge management is the process of creating, sharing, using, and managing the knowledge and information of an organization1. Knowledge management practices can help capture, document, and transfer the valuable knowledge and expertise of the experienced staff before they leave the organization, as well as facilitate the learning and development of the new or existing staff. Knowledge management practices can also enhance the organizational performance, innovation, and competitiveness by leveraging the intellectual capital and creating a culture of knowledge sharing2. According to a study by 3, the impact of knowledge management practices on employee retention is significant and positive in both IT and banking industries. Another study by 4 found that knowledge management practices can improve job satisfaction and employee retention by fostering a supportive work environment, providing growth opportunities, and rewarding knowledge contributions. Therefore, implementing knowledge management practices can help mitigate the risk of losing experienced staff and their knowledge in the long run.

The other options are not the best long-term solutions, because they are either short-term or partial solutions. Establishing a mentoring program for IT staff can help transfer some of the knowledge and skills of the experienced staff to the mentees, but it may not be sufficient or systematic enough to capture and preserve all the relevant knowledge. Determining key risk indicators (KRIs) can help monitor and measure the risk exposure of losing experienced staff, but it does not address the root cause or provide a solution for the problem. Retaining key staff as consultants can help retain some of the expertise and experience of the staff, but it may not be feasible or cost-effective in the long term, and it may also create dependency and vulnerability issues for the organization.

The PRIMARY purpose of an effective set of key risk indicators (KRIs) is to identify possible future adverse impacts on the enterprise. KRIs are metrics or indicators used by organizations to identify, assess, and monitor potential risks. KRIs show how risky a decision, activity, strategy, or plan may be for a business or company. KRIs can be used to monitor operational, technological, financial and staff processes, such as security breaches, economic downturn and staff turnover rate. KRIs are like alarms that alert businesses of changes in the level of risk exposure1. By identifying possible future adverse impacts on the enterprise, KRIs can help to:

• Prevent or mitigate the negative consequences of risks, such as financial loss, operational disruption, reputational damage, legal liability, etc.
• Enhance the decision-making and planning processes by providing relevant and timely information on risks
• Align the risk management activities with the business objectives and expectations
• Communicate and report the risk status and performance to stakeholders and regulators

Therefore, identifying possible future adverse impacts on the enterprise is the primary purpose of an effective set of KRIs.

1: Key Risk Indicators: Examples & Definitions - SolveXia

 According to the CGEIT exam guide, a root cause analysis (RCA) is a systematic process of identifying and analyzing the factors that cause an undesirable event or condition. It helps to determine the underlying causes of problems and issues, and to prevent their recurrence. A root cause analysis is the best way to enable the CIO to build a corrective action plan, as it provides a clear understanding of the reasons why IT service levels consistently fall below those outlined in the SLA, and suggests possible solutions and improvements. The other options are not sufficient to build a corrective action plan, as they do not address the root causes of the SLA failure. References: CGEIT Exam Candidate Guide, page 15. CGEIT Certification, Root Cause Analysis

Communicating the objectives and responsibilities to staff is the BEST way to demonstrate senior management’s commitment to IT governance. IT governance is the process of ensuring that IT supports the achievement of the organization’s goals and objectives, and delivers value to its stakeholders1. IT governance involves aligning the IT strategy, policies, processes, and resources with the business strategy, needs, and expectations2. However, implementing and sustaining IT governance requires a significant amount of change in the organization, such as introducing new technologies, standards, roles, and responsibilities3. Therefore, communicating the objectives and responsibilities to staff is essential for demonstrating senior management’s commitment to IT governance, as it can:

• Provide the direction and mandate for the IT governance initiative on an ongoing basis
• Communicate the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the IT function to all stakeholders
• Allocate the necessary resources and capabilities to enable the IT governance processes and activities
• Monitor and evaluate the performance and outcomes of the IT function and provide feedback and recognition
• Foster a positive and collaborative culture that values IT as a strategic partner and enabler of the business

The other options are not as good as option C. While it is important to communicate the legal and regulatory requirements, the approved IT investment opportunities, and the need for enterprise architecture (EA), these are not sufficient to demonstrate senior management’s commitment to IT governance. They are rather means to achieve the end goal of implementing and sustaining IT governance. They do not necessarily reflect the level of commitment, involvement, and support from the management toward IT governance. References :=

• What is IT Governance? Definition & Examples | ASQ2
• What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy1
• How to Involve Senior Management in the Information Security Governance …3