Isaca Updated CGEIT Exam Questions and Answers by zayne

IT strategic planning processes need to be adequately documented and communicated for several reasons, but the most important one is to promote transparency to stakeholders. Transparency means being open, honest, and accountable for the actions and decisions of the IT department. Transparency helps to build trust, credibility, and confidence among the stakeholders, such as senior management, business units, customers, suppliers, regulators, and employees1. By documenting and communicating the IT strategic planning processes, the IT department can demonstrate how it aligns its goals and objectives with the business strategy, how it prioritizes and executes its projects and initiatives, how it measures and reports its performance and outcomes, and how it manages its risks and challenges. Documenting and communicating the IT strategic planning processes also enables the IT department to solicit feedback and input from the stakeholders, and to address any issues or concerns that may arise23.

The other options are not as important as promoting transparency to stakeholders. Justifying spending on IT projects is a benefit of documenting and communicating the IT strategic planning processes, but it is not the primary reason. Ensuring other departments are aligned with the direction set by IT is a result of documenting and communicating the IT strategic planning processes, but it is not the main purpose. Informing business units of IT department achievements is a part of documenting and communicating the IT strategic planning processes, but it is not the most important reason.

References: 1: Creating an IT Strategy Communications Plan: 5 Keys to Success4 2: IT Strategy Template for a Successful Strategic Plan | Gartner1 3: 14 Ways To Document Communications Processes For Faster … - Forbes

The accountability for a business continuity program for business-critical systems is best assigned to the CIO, because the CIO is responsible for the IT strategy, operations, and resources that support the business objectives and continuity. The other options are not as suitable as the CIO, because they do not have the same level of authority, expertise, or involvement in the IT function. The enterprise risk manager oversees the overall risk management process, but does not have direct control over the IT resources and activities. The CEO is ultimately accountable for the entire organization, but delegates the responsibility for IT to the CIO. The director of internal audit provides assurance and consulting services on the effectiveness of governance, risk management, and control processes, but does not have operational responsibility for IT or business continuity. References := Business Continuity Program Roles & Responsibilities, Who Should Manage the Business Continuity Program?

• This is because performance metrics are measurable values that indicate how well the IT assets are performing in terms of functionality, quality, efficiency, and effectiveness1. By implementing performance metrics for key IT assets, the organization can:

Implementing performance metrics for key IT assets can help the organization determine the contribution of IT assets in achievement of IT goals, and ensure that they deliver value to the business.

The other options, establishing the span of control during the life cycle of IT assets, determining the average cost of controls for protection of IT assets, and comparing the performance of IT assets against industry best practices are not as beneficial as determining the contribution of IT assets in achievement of IT goals for implementing performance metrics for key IT assets. They are more related to specific aspects or outcomes of IT asset management, rather than a holistic and strategic benefit. They may also not be relevant or applicable to all types or categories of IT assets. They may not address the full scope or potential of IT asset improvement and optimization. References := What Is an IT Asset Management KPI? | Filewave, Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance - ISACA

This is because enterprise risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing and able to accept in pursuit of its objectives. It reflects the organization’s risk culture, strategy, and values. When implementing an emerging technology with unclear regulatory and compliance requirements, the organization should consider its risk appetite and tolerance, as well as the potential benefits, costs, and impacts of the technology. The organization should also assess the likelihood and severity of the regulatory and compliance risks, and implement appropriate controls and mitigation measures to manage them within acceptable levels.

Some of the sources that support this answer are:

• 1: This source provides a comprehensive guide on how to navigate the hype and risk of emerging technologies. It suggests that organizations should define their risk appetite and tolerance for adopting emerging technologies, and conduct a balanced risk and benefit assessment before making any decisions.
• 2: This source discusses the challenges and best practices for mitigating emerging technology risk. It recommends that organizations should align their emerging technology strategy with their enterprise risk appetite, and establish a governance framework that covers the identification, evaluation, response, and monitoring of emerging technology risks.
• 3: This source defines enterprise risk appetite and explains its importance for effective risk management. It also provides some guidance on how to develop, communicate, and monitor enterprise risk appetite statements.