Isaca Updated CISA Exam Questions and Answers by khalil

The greatest concern with the lack of structure for technology risk governance is C. Key decision-making entities for technology risk have not been identified. Technology risk governance is the process of establishing and maintaining the policies, roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities for managing technology risks within an organization1. Technology risk governance requires a clear organizational structure that defines who has the authority and responsibility to make decisions, set objectives, allocate resources, monitor performance, and ensure compliance for technology risk management2. Without such a structure, an organization may face the following challenges:

Lack of alignment and integration between technology and business strategies, leading to suboptimal outcomes and missed opportunities.

Lack of clarity and consistency in technology risk identification, assessment, mitigation, and reporting, leading to gaps and overlaps in risk coverage and exposure.

Lack of communication and collaboration among different stakeholders involved in technology risk management, leading to conflicts and inefficiencies.

Lack of oversight and accountability for technology risk management activities and results, leading to poor quality and reliability.

The IS auditor’s greatest concern when reviewing a business case for a proposed implementation of a third-party system should be A. Lack of ongoing maintenance costs. This is because ongoing maintenance costs are an essential part of the total cost of ownership (TCO) of a third-party system, and they can have a significant impact on the return on investment (ROI) and the feasibility of the project. If the business case does not include ongoing maintenance costs, it may underestimate the true cost of the project and overestimate the benefits. This could lead to poor decision making and unrealistic expectations.

Lack of training materials (B), lack of plan for pilot implementation ©, and lack of detailed work breakdown structure (D) are also potential issues that could affect the quality and success of the project, but they are not as critical as lack of ongoing maintenance costs. Training materials can be developed or acquired later, pilot implementation can be planned during the project initiation or planning phase, and work breakdown structure can be refined as the project progresses. However, ongoing maintenance costs are difficult to change or estimate once the project is approved and implemented, and they can have long-term implications for the organization. Therefore, they should be included and analyzed in the business case.

The best recommendation for the auditor to make is D. Line management should regularly review and request modification of access rights. Access rights are the permissions and privileges granted to users to access, view, modify, or delete data or resources on a system or network1. Excessive rights are access rights that are not necessary or appropriate for a user’s role or function, and may pose a risk of unauthorized or inappropriate use of data or resources2. Therefore, it is important to ensure that access rights are alignedwith the principle of least privilege, which means that users should only have the minimum level of access required to perform their duties2.

Line management is responsible for overseeing and supervising the activities and performance of their staff, and ensuring that they comply with the organization’s policies and standards3. Therefore, line management should regularly review and request modification of access rights for their staff, as they are in the best position to:

Understand the roles and functions of their staff, and determine the appropriate level of access rights needed for them to perform their duties effectively and efficiently.

Monitor and evaluate the usage and behavior of their staff, and identify any changes or anomalies that may indicate excessive or inappropriate access rights.

Communicate and collaborate with IT security or system administrators, who are responsible for granting, revoking, or modifying access rights, and request any necessary adjustments or corrections.

A full interruption test is the most realistic and reliable way to ensure that recovery time objectives (RTOs) are met for an organization’s disaster recovery plan (DRP). RTOs are the maximum amount of time that a business can tolerate being offline after a disaster. A full interruption test involves shutting down the primary site and switching over to the backup site, simulating a real disaster scenario. This test can measure the actual time it takes to restore the systems, applications, and functions that arecritical for the business continuity. A full interruption test can also reveal any issues or gaps in the DRP that might affect the recovery process.

The other options are not as effective as a full interruption test for ensuring RTOs are met. A cyber resilience test is a type of DR test that focuses on the ability to withstand and recover from cyberattacks. It does not necessarily cover other types of disasters or test the entire DRP. A tabletop test is a low-impact DR test that involves a walkthrough of the DRP with the key stakeholders and staff. It does not involve any actual switching over or testing of the backup systems. A parallel test is a type of DR test that involves running the backup systems alongside the primary systems, without disrupting the normal operations. It does not measure the time it takes to switch over or resume operations at the backup site.

References:

Best Practices For Disaster Recovery Testing

Disaster recovery testing

Disaster Recovery Testing: Everything to Know