Isaca Updated CISA Exam Questions and Answers by fabian

The performance and reliability of a job scheduling tool can be significantly affected if maintenance patches and the latest enhancement upgrades are missing1. These patches and upgrades often contain fixes for known issues and improvements to the tool’s functionality. If they are not applied, the tool may continue to exhibit known problems or fail to benefit from enhancements that could improve its performance and reliability1. While factors like administrator password requirements23, number of support staff45, and tool classification64 can impact various aspects of a tool’s operation, they are less likely to be the direct cause of performance and reliability problems.

References:

Patch Management Definition & Best Practices - Rapid7

Password must meet complexity requirements - Windows Security

NIST’s New Password Rule Book: Updated Guidelines Offer Benefits and Risk - ISACA

Workforce optimization: Staff scheduling with AI | McKinsey

Poor Employee Scheduling - Major Consequences And Solutions

A Critical Analysis of Job Shop Scheduling in Context of Industry 4.0

 Scope creep is the uncontrolled expansion of a project’s scope, which can result in delays, cost overruns, and quality issues. To mitigate the risk of scope creep, an IS auditor should look for project change management controls, which are processes and procedures for managing changes to the project’s scope, schedule, budget, and quality. Project change management controls ensure that changes are properly requested, approved, documented, communicated, and implemented. Source code version control, existence of an architecture review board, and configuration management are also important for software development, but they do not directly address the risk of scope creep. References: ISACA Frameworks: Blueprints for Success, Project Management Institute: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge

Machine shredding is the process of using a shredding machine to physically destroy the media and make the data unrecoverable. This is more effective than software formatting, which only erases the data logically and may leave traces that can be recovered by special tools1. Encrypting and destroying keys may prevent unauthorized access to the data, but it does not erase the data from the media. Wiping and rewriting three times is unnecessary and may reduce the lifespan of the media, especially for solid state drives2. Machine shredding is also recommended by various security standards and guidelines for media disposal345.

Parallel simulation involves running the same data through two systems and comparing the results1. In this case, the bank’s data would be processed using both the modified interest calculation program and an audit software. The results from both systems would then be compared to check for discrepancies1. This technique provides strong evidence of the correctness of interest calculations as it directly tests the program’s output against a known and trusted output1. While source code review23, manual verification of a sample of results4567, and review of QA test results8910 can also provide valuable insights, they do not offer the same level of direct, comparative evidence as parallel simulation1.

References:

Parallel simulation in IT testing - Universal CPA Review

5 code review best practices - Work Life by Atlassian

How to Make Good Code Reviews Better - Stack Overflow

Guidelines for the validation and verification of quantitative and qualitative test methods - Mathematics LibreTexts

Method Validation and Verification - University of Utah

Sample Procedure for Method Validation - NIST

Method validation and verification - CFS

Good Practices for Quality Assurance Reviewers: Assessing Evidence of Supervisory Review - IGNET

How do quality assurance engineers test calculations? - Software Quality Assurance & Testing Stack Exchange

Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan and Procedures - UNFCCC