Amazon Web Services braindumps2go mls-c01 Leak Questions by Melisa q187 vce pdf

Page: 2 / 22

Exam Name:	AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty
Exam Code:	MLS-C01 Dumps
Vendor:	Amazon Web Services	Certification:	AWS Certified Specialty
Questions:	307 Q&A's	Shared By:	melisa

Question 8

A law firm handles thousands of contracts every day. Every contract must be signed. Currently, a lawyer manually checks all contracts for signatures.

The law firm is developing a machine learning (ML) solution to automate signature detection for each contract. The ML solution must also provide a confidence score for each contract page.

Which Amazon Textract API action can the law firm use to generate a confidence score for each page of each contract?

Options:

Use the AnalyzeDocument API action. Set the FeatureTypes parameter to SIGNATURES. Return the confidence scores for each page.

Use the Prediction API call on the documents. Return the signatures and confidence scores for each page.

Use the StartDocumentAnalysis API action to detect the signatures. Return the confidence scores for each page.

Use the GetDocumentAnalysis API action to detect the signatures. Return the confidence scores for each page

Discussion

Answer:

Explanation:

The AnalyzeDocument API action is the best option to generate a confidence score for each page of each contract. This API action analyzes an input document for relationships between detected items. The input document can be an image file in JPEG or PNG format, or a PDF file. The output is a JSON structure that contains the extracted data from the document. The FeatureTypes parameter specifies the types of analysis to perform on the document. The available feature types are TABLES, FORMS, and SIGNATURES. By setting the FeatureTypes parameter to SIGNATURES, the API action will detect and extract information about signatures from the document. The output will include a list of SignatureDetection objects, each containing information about a detected signature, such as its location and confidence score. The confidence score is a value between 0 and 100 that indicates the probability that the detected signature is correct. The output will also include a list of Block objects, each representing a document page. Each Block object will have a Page attribute that contains the page number and a Confidence attribute that contains the confidence score for the page. The confidence score for the page is the average of the confidence scores of the blocks that are detected on the page. The law firm can use the AnalyzeDocument API action to generate a confidence score for each page of each contract by using the SIGNATURES feature type and returning the confidence scores from the SignatureDetection and Block objects.

The other options are not suitable for generating a confidence score for each page of each contract. The Prediction API call is not an Amazon Textract API action, but a generic term for making inference requests to a machine learning model. The StartDocumentAnalysis API action is used to start an asynchronous job to analyze a document. The output is a job identifier (JobId) that is used to get the results of the analysis with the GetDocumentAnalysis API action. The GetDocumentAnalysis API action is used to get the results of a document analysis started by the StartDocumentAnalysis API action. The output is a JSON structure that contains the extracted data from the document. However, both the StartDocumentAnalysis and the GetDocumentAnalysis API actions do not support the SIGNATURES feature type, and therefore cannot detect signatures or provide confidence scores for them.

References:

•AnalyzeDocument

•SignatureDetection

•Block

•Amazon Textract launches the ability to detect signatures on any document

Question 9

A developer at a retail company is creating a daily demand forecasting model. The company stores the historical hourly demand data in an Amazon S3 bucket. However, the historical data does not include demand data for some hours.

The developer wants to verify that an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) approach will be a suitable model for the use case.

How should the developer verify the suitability of an ARIMA approach?

Options:

Use Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. Import the data from Amazon S3. Impute hourly missing data. Perform a Seasonal Trend decomposition.

Use Amazon SageMaker Autopilot. Create a new experiment that specifies the S3 data location. Choose ARIMA as the machine learning (ML) problem. Check the model performance.

Use Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. Import the data from Amazon S3. Resample data by using the aggregate daily total. Perform a Seasonal Trend decomposition.

Use Amazon SageMaker Autopilot. Create a new experiment that specifies the S3 data location. Impute missing hourly values. Choose ARIMA as the machine learning (ML) problem. Check the model performance.

Discussion

Answer:

Explanation:

The best solution to verify the suitability of an ARIMA approach is to use Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. Data Wrangler is a feature of SageMaker Studio that provides an end-to-end solution for importing, preparing, transforming, featurizing, and analyzing data. Data Wrangler includes built-in analyses that help generate visualizations and data insights in a few clicks. One of the built-in analyses is the Seasonal-Trend decomposition, which can be used to decompose a time series into its trend, seasonal, and residual components. This analysis can help the developer understand the patterns and characteristics of the time series, such as stationarity, seasonality, and autocorrelation, which are important for choosing an appropriate ARIMA model. Data Wrangler also provides built-in transformations that can help the developer handle missing data, such as imputing with mean, median, mode, or constant values, or dropping rows with missing values. Imputing missing data can help avoid gaps and irregularities in the time series, which can affect the ARIMA model performance. Data Wrangler also allows the developer to export the prepared data and the analysis code to various destinations, such as SageMaker Processing, SageMaker Pipelines, or SageMaker Feature Store, for further processing and modeling.

The other options are not suitable for verifying the suitability of an ARIMA approach. Amazon SageMaker Autopilot is a feature-set that automates key tasks of an automatic machine learning (AutoML) process. It explores the data, selects the algorithms relevant to the problem type, and prepares the data to facilitate model training and tuning. However, Autopilot does not support ARIMA as a machine learning problem type, and it does not provide any visualization or analysis of the time series data. Resampling data by using the aggregate daily total can reduce the granularity and resolution of the time series, which can affect the ARIMA model accuracy and applicability.

References:

•Analyze and Visualize

•Transform and Export

•Amazon SageMaker Autopilot

•ARIMA Model – Complete Guide to Time Series Forecasting in Python

Ayra

How these dumps are necessary for passing the certification exam?

Damian Oct 22, 2024

They give you a competitive edge and help you prepare better.

Norah

Cramkey is highly recommended.

Zayan Oct 17, 2024

Definitely. If you're looking for a reliable and effective study resource, look no further than Cramkey Dumps. They're simply wonderful!

Billy

It was like deja vu! I was confident going into the exam because I had already seen those questions before.

Vincent Aug 15, 2024

Definitely. And the best part is, I passed! I feel like all that hard work and preparation paid off. Cramkey is the best resource for all students!!!

Peyton

Hey guys. Guess what? I passed my exam. Thanks a lot Cramkey, your provided information was relevant and reliable.

Coby Sep 6, 2024

Thanks for sharing your experience. I think I'll give Cramkey a try for my next exam.

Question 10

A bank wants to launch a low-rate credit promotion. The bank is located in a town that recently experienced economic hardship. Only some of the bank's customers were affected by the crisis, so the bank's credit team must identify which customers to target with the promotion. However, the credit team wants to make sure that loyal customers' full credit history is considered when the decision is made.

The bank's data science team developed a model that classifies account transactions and understands credit eligibility. The data science team used the XGBoost algorithm to train the model. The team used 7 years of bank transaction historical data for training and hyperparameter tuning over the course of several days.

The accuracy of the model is sufficient, but the credit team is struggling to explain accurately why the model denies credit to some customers. The credit team has almost no skill in data science.

What should the data science team do to address this issue in the MOST operationally efficient manner?

Options:

Use Amazon SageMaker Studio to rebuild the model. Create a notebook that uses the XGBoost training container to perform model training. Deploy the model at an endpoint. Enable Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor to store inferences. Use the inferences to create Shapley values that help explain model behavior. Create a chart that shows features and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to explain to the credit team how the features affect t

Use Amazon SageMaker Studio to rebuild the model. Create a notebook that uses the XGBoost training container to perform model training. Activate Amazon SageMaker Debugger, and configure it to calculate and collect Shapley values. Create a chart that shows features and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to explain to the credit team how the features affect the model outcomes.

Create an Amazon SageMaker notebook instance. Use the notebook instance and the XGBoost library to locally retrain the model. Use the plot_importance() method in the Python XGBoost interface to create a feature importance chart. Use that chart to explain to the credit team how the features affect the model outcomes.

Use Amazon SageMaker Studio to rebuild the model. Create a notebook that uses the XGBoost training container to perform model training. Deploy the model at an endpoint. Use Amazon SageMaker Processing to post-analyze the model and create a feature importance explainability chart automatically for the credit team.

Discussion

Question 11

A manufacturing company wants to create a machine learning (ML) model to predict when equipment is likely to fail. A data science team already constructed a deep learning model by using TensorFlow and a custom Python script in a local environment. The company wants to use Amazon SageMaker to train the model.

Which TensorFlow estimator configuration will train the model MOST cost-effectively?

Options:

Turn on SageMaker Training Compiler by adding compiler_config=TrainingCompilerConfig() as a parameter. Pass the script to the estimator in the call to the TensorFlow fit() method.

Turn on SageMaker Training Compiler by adding compiler_config=TrainingCompilerConfig() as a parameter. Turn on managed spot training by setting the use_spot_instances parameter to True. Pass the script to the estimator in the call to the TensorFlow fit() method.

Adjust the training script to use distributed data parallelism. Specify appropriate values for the distribution parameter. Pass the script to the estimator in the call to the TensorFlow fit() method.

Turn on SageMaker Training Compiler by adding compiler_config=TrainingCompilerConfig() as a parameter. Set the MaxWaitTimeInSeconds parameter to be equal to the MaxRuntimeInSeconds parameter. Pass the script to the estimator in the call to the TensorFlow fit() method.

Discussion

Answer:

Explanation:

The TensorFlow estimator configuration that will train the model most cost-effectively is to turn on SageMaker Training Compiler by adding compiler_config=TrainingCompilerConfig() as a parameter, turn on managed spot training by setting the use_spot_instances parameter to True, and pass the script to the estimator in the call to the TensorFlow fit() method. This configuration will optimize the model for the target hardware platform, reduce the training cost by using Amazon EC2 Spot Instances, and use the custom Python script without any modification.

SageMaker Training Compiler is a feature of Amazon SageMaker that enables you to optimize your TensorFlow, PyTorch, and MXNet models for inference on a variety of target hardware platforms. SageMaker Training Compiler can improve the inference performance and reduce the inference cost of your models by applying various compilation techniques, such as operator fusion, quantization, pruning, and graph optimization. You can enable SageMaker Training Compiler by adding compiler_config=TrainingCompilerConfig() as a parameter to the TensorFlow estimator constructor1.

Managed spot training is another feature of Amazon SageMaker that enables you to use Amazon EC2 Spot Instances for training your machine learning models. Amazon EC2 Spot Instances let you take advantage of unused EC2 capacity in the AWS Cloud. Spot Instances are available at up to a 90% discount compared to On-Demand prices. You can use Spot Instances for various fault-tolerant and flexible applications. You can enable managed spot training by setting the use_spot_instances parameter to True and specifying the max_wait and max_run parameters in the TensorFlow estimator constructor2.

The TensorFlow estimator is a class in the SageMaker Python SDK that allows you to train and deploy TensorFlow models on SageMaker. You can use the TensorFlow estimator to run your own Python script on SageMaker, without any modification. You can pass the script to the estimator in the call to the TensorFlow fit() method, along with the location of your input data. The fit() method starts a SageMaker training job and runs your script as the entry point in the training containers3.

The other options are either less cost-effective or more complex to implement. Adjusting the training script to use distributed data parallelism would require modifying the script and specifying appropriate values for the distribution parameter, which could increase the development time and complexity. Setting the MaxWaitTimeInSeconds parameter to be equal to the MaxRuntimeInSeconds parameter would not reduce the cost, as it would only specify the maximum duration of the training job, regardless of the instance type.

References:

1: Optimize TensorFlow, PyTorch, and MXNet models for deployment using Amazon SageMaker Training Compiler | AWS Machine Learning Blog

2: Managed Spot Training: Save Up to 90% On Your Amazon SageMaker Training Jobs | AWS Machine Learning Blog

3: sagemaker.tensorflow — sagemaker 2.66.0 documentation

Page: 2 / 22

Title

Questions

Posted

amazon web services.braindumps2go.mls-c01 leak questions.by melisa.q187.vce.pdf

187

2024-10-22

amazon web services.dumpskey.helping hand questions for mls-c01.by baxter.q125.vce.pdf