The Open Group 2cram all Ogea-103 Test Inside The Open Group Questions by Leonidas q36 vce pdf

Page: 5 / 8

Exam Name:	TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam
Exam Code:	OGEA-103 Dumps
Vendor:	The Open Group	Certification:	Enterprise Architecture
Questions:	119 Q&A's	Shared By:	leonidas

Question 20

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

You are working as an Enterprise Architect within a healthcare and life science company. The company is a

leading player in its industry, dedicated to transforming healthcare with new ideas and advancements. The

company has multiple divisions that cover different aspects of the business.

The company's Enterprise Architecture (EA) department has been operating for several years and has

mature, well-developed architecture governance and development processes following the TOGAF

Standard. In addition to the EA program, the company has a number of management frameworks in use.

The Architecture Board includes representatives from each division of the company.

Many of the company's rivals have begun utilizing Artificial Intelligence (Al) in their operations, and the

indications are that this will be transformative for healthcare delivery. This is something the EA department

has been interested in for a while, and they had recently submitted an architecture Change Request which

was approved. As a result, the CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to investigate the

implementation of Al in the company.

Areas for evaluation include:

How can staff use Al daily in their current role?

How Al can enhance access to care for patients, and how to make that experience seamless?

How Al can offer new workplace platforms and tools to increase efficiency?

Some of the top managers are worried about a change in the way of working, and if it will achieve the goals.

Many are not confident that the company's risk management processes are adequate for a company-wide

integration of generative Al. There are also questions from staff about whether enough specific guidelines

and polices have been put in place for responsible use of Al.

The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture program. The CIO has

actively encouraged architecting with agility within the EA department as her preferred approach for projects.

The CIO wants to know how to address these concerns and reduce risks.

Refer to the scenario

You have been tasked with starting the architecture development. How do you begin?

Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

Options:

You recommend that an analysis of the stakeholders is undertaken. This will allow the architects to

define groups of partners (the stakeholders) who have common concerns and include development

of a Stakeholder Map. The concerns and relevant views should then be defined for each group and

recorded in the Architecture Vision document. To mitigate risk, you include a requirement that there

be progressive development of

You recommend that a Communications Plan be created to address the key stakeholders, that is the

most powerful and influential partners. This plan should include a report that summarizes the key

features of the architecture with respect to each location and reflects the stakeholders' requirements.

You will check with each key stakeholder that their concerns are being addressed. Risk mitigation

should be explicitly ad

You recommend that models be created for the Draft Business, Data, Application, and Technology

Architectures. These can be used to ensure that the system will be compliant with the local

regulations for each division. Together with the problem description, and requirements, this ensures

that all the necessary data and detail is addressed. A formal review should be held with the

stakeholders to verify that their conce

You recommend creation of a set of business models that can be applied uniformly across all Al-

related architecture projects. These should be developed in the portable format to ensure maximum

portability across the many tools used in the firm. Each architecture should then be defined based on

this fixed set of models. All concerned parties can then examine the models to ensure that their

needs have been addressed.<

Discussion

Answer:

Explanation:

Key aspects of the scenario:

Objective:

Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare delivery, with a focus on improving patient care, enhancing workplace efficiency, and enabling seamless experiences.

Challenges:

Stakeholder concerns about risk management, adaptability to change, and ensuring alignment with regulations and policies.

Addressing the concerns of staff and top management about AI integration and achieving the desired goals.

CIO's Perspective:

Encouraging an agile approach to architecture development.

Addressing risks and ensuring stakeholder concerns are managed.

Areas for Evaluation:

AI usage by staff and impact on workflows.

Patient experience enhancement via AI.

New workplace platforms and tools powered by AI.

Option Analysis:

Option 1: Analysis of stakeholders and development of a Stakeholder Map

Pros:

Stakeholder analysis is critical for identifying concerns, viewpoints, and requirements.

TOGAF emphasizes stakeholder engagement early in the process to mitigate risks and align expectations.

Developing a Stakeholder Map ensures clear alignment with their interests and creates a foundation for regular feedback loops.

Cons:

Does not explicitly address the creation of architecture models or policies upfront.

Option 2: Creation of a Communications Plan

Pros:

A communications plan fosters effective stakeholder engagement by addressing their concerns and ensuring transparent reporting.

Risk mitigation as part of communication aligns with TOGAF’s stakeholder management practices.

Cons:

This focuses more on communication mechanics rather than advancing architectural development directly.

Option 3: Models for Draft Business, Data, Application, and Technology Architectures

Pros:

Aligns with the Architecture Development Method (ADM), ensuring compliance with requirements and regulations.

Helps formalize stakeholder feedback by verifying their concerns against tangible models.

Cons:

Developing detailed models early on may delay immediate resolution of stakeholder concerns and risk mitigation.

Option 4: Set of reusable business models for AI-related projects

Pros:

Standardized models ensure consistency and portability across the organization’s AI-related efforts.

Cons:

Too narrow in focus for the initial architecture development phase; does not address risk management or stakeholder concerns adequately.

Recommended Answer:

Option 1: You recommend that an analysis of the stakeholders is undertaken.

Reasoning:

The scenario highlights stakeholder concerns about risks, adaptability, and compliance. Addressing these concerns requires stakeholder analysis as the first step.

A Stakeholder Map aligns with TOGAF’s emphasis on stakeholder engagement, providing a structured way to manage their concerns and expectations.

Identifying concerns early and integrating feedback into the Architecture Vision document ensures alignment with goals and smooth progress.

Option 1 sets the foundation for collaboration and risk management, making it the best fit for the current phase.

Question 21

Scenario:

You are working as an Enterprise Architect within a company providing legal services. The company operates in many countries and has a complicated structure. Every office must follow the local regulations in their country.

The company’s Enterprise Architecture (EA) department has been operating for several years and has mature, well-developed architecture governance and development processes based on the TOGAF standard. In addition to the EA program, the company has several management frameworks, including business planning, project/portfolio management, and operations management. The Architecture Board includes representatives from all parts of the company.

The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture program. The CIO has actively encouraged architecting with agility within the EA department as the preferred approach for projects. The CIO has given approval for a Request for Architecture Work to explore the adoption of an AI-powered system for managing legal cases and financial processes.

Senior management has become more concerned about business performance, especially with the advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI). Many of the company’s competitors have started using AI to assist with legal strategies, streamline processes, and boost productivity. One of the most important benefits AI has for the business is its ability to increase accuracy and minimize mistakes.

Some of the top managers are worried about a change in the way of working, and if it will achieve the business goals. Their staff also fear that management will use the AI system to measure their performance. The CIO wants to know how to address these concerns and reduce risks.

The new system is expected to guide legal professionals and analysts on which tasks to focus on. The main goals are to improve productivity and make better use of staff. In addition, the CIO hopes these changes will lead to higher customer satisfaction.

Refer to the scenario:

You have been asked to respond to the Chief Information Officer (CIO) recommending an approach that would enable the development of an architecture that addresses the concerns of the top managers and the multiple branches in different parts of the company.

Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?

Options:

You recommend that models be created for each of the Business, Application, and Technology architectures. These can be used to ensure that the system will be compliant with the local regulations for each operating entity. This ensures that all necessary data and detail is addressed. A formal review should be held with the stakeholders to verify that their concerns have been properly addressed by the models

You recommend that an analysis of the stakeholders is undertaken. This will allow the architects to define groups of partners (the stakeholders) who have common concerns and include development of a Stakeholder Map. The concerns and relevant views should then be defined for each group and recorded in the Architecture Vision document. To reduce risk, you include a requirement that there be progres

C.
You recommend creation of a set of business models that can be applied uniformly across all AI-related architecture projects. These should be developed in a portable format to ensure maximum portability across the many tools used in the firm. Each architecture should then be defined based on this fixed set of models. All concerned stakeholders can then examine the models to ensure that their needs have

D.
You recommend that a Communications Plan be created to address the key stakeholders, particularly influential partners. This plan should include a report summarizing the key features of the architecture with respect to each location and reflect the stakeholders’ requirements. You will check with each key stakeholder that their concerns have been addressed. Risk mitigation should be explicitly add

Discussion

Answer:
B
Explanation:

The correct answer is B, as it aligns with TOGAF's stakeholder management approach, ensuring that stakeholder concerns are captured and addressed iteratively throughout the architecture development process.
Analysis of the Correct Answer (Option B):
Stakeholder Analysis and Mapping
The scenario highlights that top managers and staff are worried about the changes AI will bring.
TOGAF recommends stakeholder analysis early in the ADM process to ensure that concerns, expectations, and risks are documented.
Creating a Stakeholder Map groups stakeholders by common concerns, allowing architects to develop tailored viewpoints.
Recording Concerns in the Architecture Vision Document
The Architecture Vision (ADM Phase A) serves as a high-level guiding document.
Capturing stakeholder concerns in the Vision document ensures alignment between business goals and technology implementation.
Iterative Development and Regular Feedback
The scenario describes an AI-powered system with major business impacts, so incremental validation is necessary.
TOGAF emphasizes progressive development to manage risk and validate requirements continuously.
Regular feedback loops help mitigate resistance from top managers and staff.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect?
Option A: Creating Models for Business, Application, and Technology Architectures
Incorrect because while compliance is important, it does not address stakeholder concerns directly.
The scenario is about ensuring buy-in from top managers and employees, not just regulatory compliance.
Option C: Using Uniform Business Models Across AI Projects
Incorrect because a one-size-fits-all model does not allow for regional and functional differences within the company.
The scenario emphasizes the need to address specific concerns of top managers and different locations, which requires stakeholder-specific customization.
Option D: Creating a Communications Plan
Incorrect because communication alone does not resolve stakeholder concerns.
While communication is useful, the architecture development process should include stakeholder engagement and progressive validation, not just reporting.
References:
TOGAF Standard, ADM Phase A – Architecture Vision
TOGAF Standard, Stakeholder Management (ADM Guidelines and Techniques)
TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Principles – The Open Group

Question 22

Scenario
Your role is that of an Enterprise Architect, reporting to the Chief Enterprise Architect, at a technology company.
The company uses the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework for its Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice. The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) is the sponsor of the activity. The EA practice uses an iterative approach for its architecture development. This has enabled the decision-makers to gain valuable insights into the different aspects of the business.
The nature of the business is such that the data and the information stored on the company systems is the company’s major asset and is highly confidential. The company employees travel a lot for work and need to communicate over public infrastructure. They use message encryption, secure internet connections using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), and other standard security measures. The company has provided computer security awareness training for all its staff. However, despite good education and system security, there is still a need to rely on third-party suppliers for infrastructure and software.
The Chief Security Officer (CSO) has noted an increase in ransomware (malicious software used in ransom demands) attacks on companies with a similar profile. The CSO recognizes that no matter how much is spent on education and support, the company could be a victim of a significant attack that could completely lock them out of their important data.
A risk assessment has been completed, and the company has looked for cyber insurance that covers ransomware. The price for this insurance is very high. The CTO recently saw a survey that said 1 out of 4 businesses that paid ransoms could not get their data back, and almost the same number were able to recover the data without paying. The CTO has decided not to get cyber insurance to cover ransom payment.
You have been asked to describe the steps you would take to strengthen the current architecture to improve data protection.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?

Options:

A.
You would ensure that the company has in place up-to-date processes for managing change to the current Enterprise Architecture. Based on the scope of the concerns raised, you recommend that this be managed at the infrastructure level. Changes should be made to the baseline description of the Technology Architecture. The changes should be approved by the Architecture Board and implemented by change management techniques.

B.
You would request an Architecture Compliance Review with the scope to examine the company’s ability to respond to ransomware attacks. You would identify the departments involved and have them nominate representatives. You would then tailor checklists to address the requirement for increased resilience. You would circulate to the nominated representatives for them to complete. You would then review the completed checklists, identifying and r

C.
You would monitor for technology updates from your existing suppliers that could enhance the company’s capabilities to detect, react, and recover from an IT security incident. You would prepare and run a disaster recovery planning exercise for a ransomware attack and analyze the performance of the current Enterprise Architecture. Using the findings, you would prepare a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would prepare c

D.
You would assess business continuity requirements and analyze the current Enterprise Architecture for gaps. You would recommend changes to address the situation and create a change request. You would engage the Architecture Board to assess and approve the change request. Once approved, you would create a new Request for Architecture Work to begin an ADM cycle to implement the changes.

Discussion

Answer:
B
Explanation:

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation
Context of the Scenario
The scenario highlights significant risks due to ransomware attacks and the need to strengthen the company’s Enterprise Architecture to improve data protection and resilience. TOGAF emphasizes the Architecture Compliance Review as a mechanism for ensuring the architecture meets its objectives and addresses specific concerns such as security, resilience, and compliance with organizational goals.
The organization has already conducted a risk assessment but requires actionable steps to:
Address ransomware attack risks.
Increase the resilience of the Technology Architecture.
Ensure proper alignment with governance and compliance frameworks.
Option Analysis
Option A:
Strengths:
Highlights the need for up-to-date processes for managing changes in the Enterprise Architecture.
Recognizes the importance of governance through the Architecture Board and change management techniques.
Weaknesses:
The approach focuses solely on the Technology Architecture baseline but does not address the need for specific steps such as compliance review, gap analysis, or tailored resilience measures for ransomware risks.
It provides a broad and generic approach rather than a targeted plan for ransomware and data protection issues.
Conclusion: Incorrect. While it adheres to governance processes, it lacks specific actions to improve resilience and address the immediate security concerns.
Option B:
Strengths:
Proposes an Architecture Compliance Review, which is a core TOGAF process used to evaluate architecture implementation against defined objectives, ensuring it is fit for purpose.
Involves identifying stakeholders (departments) and tailoring checklists specific to ransomware resilience.
Emphasizes issue identification and resolution through structured review processes.
Weaknesses:
Does not explicitly address longer-term updates to the Enterprise Architecture, but this can be inferred as a next step following compliance recommendations.
Conclusion: Correct. This is the most suitable approach based on TOGAF principles, as it uses an established process to evaluate and improve the architecture's resilience.
Option C:
Strengths:
Includes monitoring for updates from suppliers to enhance detection and recovery capabilities, which is relevant to addressing ransomware risks.
Proposes a gap analysis to identify shortcomings in the current Enterprise Architecture and recommends addressing gaps through change requests.
Incorporates disaster recovery planning exercises, which are useful for testing resilience.
Weaknesses:
While thorough, the approach lacks the Architecture Compliance Review process, which is a more structured way to ensure the architecture meets resilience requirements.
Monitoring suppliers and running disaster recovery exercises are operational steps rather than strategic architectural improvements.
Conclusion: Incorrect. While it includes valid activities, it does not adhere to TOGAF’s structured approach for architecture assessment and compliance.
Option D:
Strengths:
Proposes analyzing business continuity requirements and assessing the architecture for gaps, which is relevant to the scenario.
Suggests initiating an ADM cycle to address gaps, which aligns with TOGAF principles.
Weaknesses:
Focusing on initiating a new ADM cycle may be premature, as the immediate priority is to evaluate the existing architecture and address specific resilience concerns.
Does not mention compliance review or tailored resilience measures for ransomware attacks, which are central to the scenario.
Conclusion: Incorrect. It proposes a broader approach that may not adequately address the immediate concerns highlighted by the CSO.
TOGAF References
Architecture Compliance Review: A structured process used to evaluate whether an architecture meets the stated goals, objectives, and requirements (TOGAF 9.2, Chapter 19). It is particularly useful for identifying and addressing resilience requirements in scenarios involving security risks.
Stakeholder Engagement: Identifying and involving stakeholders (e.g., departments) is a critical part of architecture governance and compliance review (TOGAF 9.2, Section 24.2).
Change Management: The Architecture Compliance Review supports identifying necessary changes, which are then managed through governance and change management processes (TOGAF 9.2, Section 21.6).
By choosing Option B, you align with TOGAF’s structured approach to compliance, resilience, and addressing security concerns.

Question 23

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are the Chief Enterprise Architect at a large food service company specializing in sales to trade and
wholesale, for example, restaurants and other food retailers.
One of your company's competitors has launched a revolutionary product range and is running a very
aggressive marketing campaign. Your company's resellers are successively announcing that they are not
interested in your company's products and will sell your competitor's.
The CEO has stated there must be significant change to address the situation. He has made it clear that
new markets must be found for the company's products, and that the business needs to pivot, and address the retail market as well as the existing wholesale market.
A consideration is the company's ability and willingness to change its business model, and if it is a temporary or permanent change. An additional risk factor is one of culture. The company has been used to a stable business with a reasonably well known and settled client base - all with its own local understandings and practices.
The CEO is the sponsor of the EA program within the company. You have been engaged with the sales,
logistics, production, and marketing teams, enabling the architecture activity to start. An Architecture Vision, Architecture Principles, and Requirements have all been agreed. As you move forward to develop a possible Target Architecture you have identified that some of the key stakeholders' preferences are incompatible. The incompatibilities are focused primarily on time-to-market, cost savings, and the need to bring out a fully featured product range, but there are additional factors.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked how you will address the incompatibilities between key stakeholder preferences.
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

Options:

A.
You would seek to understand value preferences and priorities of the stakeholders. You would
develop alternative Target Architectures, highlighting the gaps between current state and the
alternatives. You would consider combining features from one or more alternatives in collaboration
with the stakeholders. A formal stakeholder review should then be held to decide which alternative is
fit for purpose and should be mo

B.
You recommend that since the CEO has stated that the company must pivot, it is better to
compromise on a full product range rather than time-to-market. You would develop just enough of the
Target Architecture to demonstrate fitness of the proposed approach. You would limit the description
to just where there is a gap between the current baseline. You would seek approval by the
stakeholders to move forward with develo

C.
You would use the Architecture Vision, Principles, and Requirements to define a set of criteria for
alternatives and create a set of architecture views to illustrate the impact of the alternative Target
Architectures. You would identify the impact on planned projects. You would understand the strengths
and weaknesses of the alternatives. You would conduct a formal stakeholder review to decide which
alternative to mov

D.
You would review the Stakeholder Map and ensure that you have addressed and represented the
concerns of all department heads. You will involve them in resolving the incompatibilities. The
Communications Plan should include a report that summarizes the key features of the architecture
with and how incompatibilities were resolved to reflects the stakeholders' requirements. You will
check with each key stakeholder they

Discussion

Answer:
C
Explanation:

According to the TOGAF standard, the Target Architecture is the description of a future state of the architecture being developed for an organization. It should be aligned with the Architecture Vision, Principles, and Requirements that have been agreed with the stakeholders. To address the incompatibilities between key stakeholder preferences, the TOGAF standard recommends creating and evaluating multiple alternative Target Architectures that meet different sets of criteria. These criteria should reflect the value preferences and priorities of the stakeholders, as well as the business drivers and objectives. The alternative Target Architectures should be illustrated using a set of architecture views that show the impact of each alternative on the business, data, application, and technology domains. The impact on planned projects should also be identified and analyzed. The strengths and weaknesses of each alternative should be understood and documented. A formal stakeholder review should then be conducted to decide which alternative is the most fit for purpose and should be moved forward with. The funding required for implementing the chosen alternative should also be determined and secured. References:
The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase B: Business Architecture - The Open Group
The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase C: Information Systems Architectures - The Open Group
[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase D: Technology Architecture - The Open Group]
[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions - The Open Group]
[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase F: Migration Planning - The Open Group]

Hassan

Highly Recommended Dumps… today I passed my exam! Same questions appear. I bought Full Access.

Kasper Oct 20, 2024
Hey wonderful….so same questions , sounds good. Planning to write this week, I will go for full access today.

Lois

I passed my exam with wonderful score. Their dumps are 100% valid and I felt confident during the exam.

Ernie Oct 29, 2024
Absolutely. The best part is, the answers in the dumps were correct. So, I felt confident and well-prepared for the exam.

Ella-Rose

Amazing website with excellent Dumps. I passed my exam and secured excellent marks!!!

Alisha Aug 17, 2024
Extremely accurate. They constantly update their materials with the latest exam questions and answers, so you can be confident that what you're studying is up-to-date.

Syeda

I passed, Thank you Cramkey for your precious Dumps.

Stella Aug 25, 2024
That's great. I think I'll give Cramkey Dumps a try.

Sarah

Yeah, I was so relieved when I saw that the question appeared in the exam were similar to their exam dumps. It made the exam a lot easier and I felt confident going into it.

Aaliyah Aug 27, 2024
Same here. I've heard mixed reviews about using exam dumps, but for us, it definitely paid off.

Previous

Page: 5 / 8

Next

Title

Questions

Posted

the open group.certsexpert.download full version ogea-103 exam.by amaan.q20.vce.pdf

20

2025-03-04

the open group.dumpscollection.vce ogea-103 questions latest.by murphy.q24.vce.pdf

24

2025-03-19

the open group.dumpskey.helping hand questions for ogea-103.by inaya.q28.vce.pdf

28

2025-03-06

the open group.2cram.all ogea-103 test inside the open group questions.by leonidas.q36.vce.pdf

36

2025-04-02

the open group.transcender.enterprise architecture ogea-103 exam questions and answers pdf.by asa.q28.vce.pdf

28

2025-03-03

the open group.pass4success.newly released ogea-103 exam pdf.by rohan.q20.vce.pdf

20

2025-04-03

the open group.actualtests.the open group ogea-103 questions answers.by remi.q24.vce.pdf

24

2025-03-07

Get Premium Access

OGEA-103
PDF

$36.75 ~~$104.99~~

$56 ~~$159.99~~

Add to Cart

OGEA-103 Testing Engine

$43.75 ~~$124.99~~

$63 ~~$179.99~~

Add to Cart

OGEA-103 PDF + Testing Engine

$57.75 ~~$164.99~~

Add to Cart

Month End Sale Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: get65

cramkey logo

Exam Dumps:

Cramkey Website:

The Open Group Updated OGEA-103 Exam Questions and Answers by leonidas

The Open Group OGEA-103 Exam Overview :

OGEA-103
PDF

OGEA-103 Testing Engine

OGEA-103 PDF + Testing Engine

Recently New Launched IT Exams

Month End Sale Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: get65

cramkey logo

Exam Dumps:

Cramkey Website:

The Open Group Updated OGEA-103 Exam Questions and Answers by leonidas

The Open Group OGEA-103 Exam Overview :

OGEA-103PDF

OGEA-103 Testing Engine

OGEA-103 PDF + Testing Engine

Recently New Launched IT Exams

OGEA-103
PDF