Virginia Insurance Updated Virginia-Life-Annuities-and-Health-Insurance Exam Questions and Answers by lachlan

In long-term care (LTC) insurance, the elimination period, per Virginia Code § 38.2-5202, is the waiting period between the onset of a qualifying condition (e.g., confinement due to inability to perform ADLs) and the start of benefit payments. It’s akin to a deductible in days (e.g., 30, 60, or 90 days), during which the insured must cover costs. Option D correctly names this period. Option A (trial period) isn’t a standard LTC term. Option B (exclusion period) might confuse with pre-existing condition exclusions, but it’s not the waiting period for benefits. Option C (qualifying period) could imply eligibility determination, but “elimination period” is the precise industry term. The study guide likely defines this as a cost-sharing feature, with examples illustrating how longer periods reduce premiums, solidifying D as the answer.

Virginia Code § 38.2-5200 defines Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in long-term care (LTC) insurance as basic self-care tasks triggering benefits if the insured can’t perform them (typically 2 of 6). Option D lists common ADLs: dressing, eating, bathing, and mobility (often with toileting and transferring), aligning with federal and Virginia standards (e.g., HIPAA). Option A (age, sex, income, occupation) is underwriting data, not ADLs. Option B (health providers) is unrelated to functional ability. Option C (family members) might confuse beneficiaries, not ADLs. The study guide likely lists ADLs with examples—e.g., needing help bathing due to arthritis—emphasizing their role in LTC eligibility, making D the precise answer.

Virginia Code § 38.2-1826(C) mandates that licensees (agents, brokers, etc.) report administrative actions—such as license revocation or fines by another state or agency—to the Bureau of Insurance within 30 calendar days of the final disposition. “Final disposition” means the conclusion of the action (e.g., final order or settlement). This requirement ensures Virginia regulators can assess the licensee’s fitness to hold a license and protect consumers. Option C (30 days) matches this statutory timeline precisely. Option A (10 days) is too short and not supported by Virginia law. Option B (20 days) lacks a basis in the Code or study materials. Option D (45 days) exceeds the mandated period, risking delayed oversight. The study guide likely emphasizes this 30-day rule as a critical compliance deadline, reinforced by Virginia’s alignment with NAIC standards for licensee reporting, making C the definitive answer.

Virginia Code § 38.2-1833 defines an “appointment” as a formal authorization by an insurer for a licensed agent to act on its behalf in transacting insurance. An insured (option A) is the policyholder or beneficiary and has no role in representing the insurer. An employee of the insurer (option B) may work internally but isn’t automatically appointed to sell insurance unless they hold an agent’s license and an appointment, which isn’t implied here. A consultant (option C), under Virginia Code § 38.2-1837, advises on insurance but doesn’t transact it unless also licensed and appointed as an agent, making this a less direct fit. Only an agent (option D), licensed under Virginia Code § 38.2-1819 and appointed per § 38.2-1833, is required to hold an appointment to represent an insurer. The study guide emphasizes that appointments link licensed agents to specific insurers, solidifying D as the correct choice.