Oracle Updated 1z0-1046-24 Exam Questions and Answers by oren

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud uses a matching algorithm to identify duplicate person records during hiring or reapplication, even across legal employers within the same enterprise. This is critical to avoid duplicate records when national identifiers change.

Option A: Date of birth and middle name alone are not the standard criteria; the algorithm uses a broader combination for accuracy.

Option B: Incorrect. The system attempts to match records before creating duplicates, using predefined rules.

Option C: Incorrect. A changed national identifier does not prevent matching; the system relies on other attributes, not solely the identifier.

Option D: Correct. Oracle’s person matching rules (configurable via "Manage Person Duplicate Identification") use combinations like:

First name, first character of last name, and date of birth; or

Last name, first character of first name, and date of birth.These rules identify matches despite a new national identifier, ensuring the candidate is linked to their prior record if other key attributes align.

The correct answer isD, as detailed in "Implementing Global Human Resources" on person record matching.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The Action framework in Oracle HCM Cloud consists of Action Types, Actions, and Action Reasons:

B: True—Action Types(e.g., Promotion, Termination) are seeded by Oracle and cannot be user-defined, providing a fixed categorization structure.

D: True—Action Reasons(e.g., "Career Advancement") include seeded values but can be user-defined via Manage Action Reasons, allowing customization to meet specific needs like the missing promotion reason.

A: False—Actions (e.g., "Internal Promotion") can be user-defined and linked to seeded action types.

C: False—Action Reasons are customizable, not fully seeded.

Options B and D clarify the framework’s flexibility and constraints, helping the specialist address the issue per Oracle’s documentation.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Person Number in Oracle HCM Cloud is a unique identifier for individuals, and its generation method is configured at the enterprise level via the "Manage Enterprise HCM Information" task. The behavior described—showing "Generated Automatically" with no number until the final save—indicates a specific setting.

Option C ("Person Number at the Enterprise Level is set to Automatic after final save") is correct. When configured this way, the Person Number is not assigned during data entry or review but is generated only after the transaction is fully saved. This ensures the number is allocated only when the record is committed, avoiding unused numbers if the process is abandoned. The "Implementing Global Human Resources" guide explains this option under Person Number generation settings.

Option A ("Person Number at the Enterprise Level is set to Manual") would require manual entry, not automatic generation.

Option B ("Person Number at the Enterprise Level is set to Automatic before submission") would assign the number earlier, visible during review, contradicting the scenario.

Option D ("Worker Number at the Enterprise level is set to Manual") is irrelevant, as "Worker Number" is not a standard term here; it’s Person Number.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Oracle HCM Cloud allows UI customizations via Page Composer (for page-level changes) and Transaction Design Studio (for transaction-specific rules). When conflicting changes occur—e.g., Page Composer making the location field required and Transaction Design Studio hiding it for managers—the system resolves this based on the timestamp of the last modification. The documentation states that if modifications from both tools conflict, the most recent change (based on creation or update date) takes precedence, regardless of the tool used. This ensures predictable behavior without requiring a strict hierarchy between the tools.

Option A (page error) is incorrect as the system doesn’t crash—it resolves conflicts silently. Option B (inconsistent behavior) is misleading because Oracle provides a clear resolution mechanism. Option C (TDS always overrides) and Option D (Page Composer always overrides) are incorrect because precedence isn’t tool-specific but time-based. Option E accurately reflects Oracle’s behavior: the last change applied in either tool wins, aligning with the customer’s observed UI rendering.