Expert Answers to Swift Exam CSP-Assessor Questions

Page: 1 / 8

Customer Security Programme (CSP) Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification(CSPAC)

Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification(CSPAC)

Last Update Apr 1, 2025
Total Questions : 116

To help you prepare for the CSP-Assessor Swift exam, we are offering free CSP-Assessor Swift exam questions. All you need to do is sign up, provide your details, and prepare with the free CSP-Assessor practice questions. Once you have done that, you will have access to the entire pool of Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification(CSPAC) CSP-Assessor test questions which will help you better prepare for the exam. Additionally, you can also find a range of Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification(CSPAC) resources online to help you better understand the topics covered on the exam, such as Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification(CSPAC) CSP-Assessor video tutorials, blogs, study guides, and more. Additionally, you can also practice with realistic Swift CSP-Assessor exam simulations and get feedback on your progress. Finally, you can also share your progress with friends and family and get encouragement and support from them.

Questions 2

Application Hardening basically applies the following principles. (Choose all that apply.)

Questions 2

Options:

Least Privileges

Access on a need to have

Reduced footprint for less potential vulnerabilities

Enhanced Straight Through Processing

Discussion 0

Answer:

A, B, C

Explanation:

Application Hardening is a key concept within theSwift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF), specifically addressed under security controls related to protecting systems and reducing vulnerabilities. The CSCF outlines principles to secure applications by minimizing risks, particularly in the context of Swift-related systems. Let’s break down the options and verify them against Swift CSP guidelines.

Step 1: Understand Application Hardening in the Context of Swift CSP

Application Hardening refers to the process of securing an application by reducing its attack surface, limiting access, and mitigating potential vulnerabilities. This aligns with Swift CSP’s overarching goal of enhancing the security of the Swift user community, as outlined in theCSCF v2024(and prior versions like CSCF v2023). Relevant controls fall under domains likeControl Objective 2: Protect Critical SystemsandControl Objective 6: Detect Anomalous Activity.

Step 2: Evaluate Each Option Against Swift CSP Principles

A. Least PrivilegesThe principle of least privilege is a core tenet of application hardening. It ensures that applications (and users) only have the minimum permissions necessary to perform their functions, reducing the risk of misuse or exploitation. This is explicitly referenced in theCSCF v2024, underControl 2.1: Operating System Privileged Account Control, which emphasizes restricting privileges to the minimum required. Application Hardening extends this to software processes, ensuring they run with minimal rights.Conclusion: This applies.

B. Access on a need to haveThis principle, often phrased as “need-to-know” or “need-to-have” in security contexts, ensures that access to applications or their components is granted only to entities that require it for their role. In the Swift CSP, this aligns withControl 2.3: System Access Control, which mandates that access to Swift-related systems (including applications) is restricted to authorized users or processes. Application Hardening incorporates this by ensuring that applications only expose interfaces or resources to authorized entities.Conclusion: This applies.

C. Reduced footprint for less potential vulnerabilitiesReducing the attack surface (or “footprint”) of an application is a fundamental hardening technique. This involves disabling unnecessary features, services, or modules that could be exploited. TheCSCF v2024addresses this underControl 2.5A: Application Hardening, which explicitly requires users to minimize the attack surface of Swift-related applications by removing unused components and limiting exposed services. This directly correlates with reducing potential vulnerabilities.Conclusion: This applies.

D. Enhanced Straight Through Processing (STP)Straight Through Processing refers to the automated, end-to-end processing of transactions without manual intervention, a concept often associated with operational efficiency in financial systems. While STP is relevant to Swift’s messaging and transaction workflows, it is not a principle of Application Hardening. The CSCF does not link STP to security hardening practices, which focus on reducing vulnerabilities rather than optimizing transaction flows.Conclusion: This does not apply.

Step 3: Conclusion and Verification

Application Hardening, as per theSwift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF), focuses on security principles that minimize risks to applications. The verified principles areLeast Privileges (A),Access on a need to have (B), andReduced footprint for less potential vulnerabilities (C). These align with Swift CSP’s emphasis on securing critical systems and reducing attack surfaces.

References

Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 2.5A: Application Hardening.

Swift Customer Security Programme – Security Best Practices, Section: Application Security.

CSCF v2024, Control 2.1: Operating System Privileged Account Control, and Control 2.3: System Access Control.

Questions 3

What is the purpose of the High-Level Test Plan (HLTP) provided by SWIFT? (Select the correct answer)

•Swift Customer Security Controls Policy

•Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025

•Independent Assessment Framework

•Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines

•Independent Assessment Framework - High-Level Test Plan Guidelines

•Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025

•CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree

•CSP_controls_matrix_and_high_test_plan_2025

•Assessment template for Mandatory controls

•Assessment template for Advisory controls

•CSCF Assessment Completion Letter

•Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template

Options:

The HLTP provides a way of testing and the typical evidence for each control (based on implementation guidelines) and must be strictly followed

The HLTP provides a way of testing and the typical evidence for each control (based on implementation guidelines), testing should be ideally based on it

The HLTP provides the rules to define the sample for testing

The HLTP provides a detailed way of control testing

Discussion 0

Conor

I recently used these dumps for my exam and I must say, I was impressed with their authentic material.

Yunus Sep 13, 2024

Exactly…….The information in the dumps is so authentic and up-to-date. Plus, the questions are very similar to what you'll see on the actual exam. I felt confident going into the exam because I had studied using Cramkey Dumps.

Elise

I've heard that Cramkey is one of the best websites for exam dumps. They have a high passing rate and the questions are always up-to-date. Is it true?

Cian Sep 26, 2024

Definitely. The dumps are constantly updated to reflect the latest changes in the certification exams. And I also appreciate how they provide explanations for the answers, so I could understand the reasoning behind each question.

Cody

I used Cramkey Dumps to prepare and a lot of the questions on the exam were exactly what I found in their study materials.

Eric Sep 13, 2024

Really? That's great to hear! I used Cramkey Dumps too and I had the same experience. The questions were almost identical.

Rosalie

I passed. I would like to tell all students that they should definitely give Cramkey Dumps a try.

Maja Aug 30, 2024

That sounds great. I'll definitely check them out. Thanks for the suggestion!

Questions 4

A Swift user uses an application integrating a sFTP client to push files to a service bureau sFTP server What architecture type is the Swift user? (Choose all that apply.)

Questions 4

Options:

Discussion 0

Questions 5

A SWIFT user has had part of controls assessed by their internal audit department, and the other remaining controls using an external assessor company. Is this acceptable? (Select the correct answer)

•Swift Customer Security Controls Policy

•Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025

•Independent Assessment Framework

•Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines

•Independent Assessment Framework - High-Level Test Plan Guidelines

•Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025

•CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree

•CSP_controls_matrix_and_high_test_plan_2025

•Assessment template for Mandatory controls

•Assessment template for Advisory controls

•CSCF Assessment Completion Letter

•Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template