Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect (WI25)
Last Update Jan 30, 2025
Total Questions : 78
To help you prepare for the Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Salesforce exam, we are offering free Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Salesforce exam questions. All you need to do is sign up, provide your details, and prepare with the free Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect practice questions. Once you have done that, you will have access to the entire pool of Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect (WI25) Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect test questions which will help you better prepare for the exam. Additionally, you can also find a range of Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect (WI25) resources online to help you better understand the topics covered on the exam, such as Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect (WI25) Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect video tutorials, blogs, study guides, and more. Additionally, you can also practice with realistic Salesforce Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect exam simulations and get feedback on your progress. Finally, you can also share your progress with friends and family and get encouragement and support from them.
A custom ServiceFeedback object is used to collect partner feedback.
ServiceFeedback records should be available to all internal employees. The organization-wide default (OWD) is set to Private for external users so partners cannot see feedback from other partner users.
How should the architect give access to all internal employees?
Universal Containers uses Person Accounts to represent retail customers and Business Accounts to represent commercial customers. The retail sales team should not have access to commercial customers but should have access to ALL retailcustomers.
With the organization-wide default on Account set to Private, how should the architect meet these requirements?
Universal Containers is planning to pilot a new application to a small set of sales reps.
What is the optimal way to grant only those sales reps access to the new functionality, while hiding the legacy functionality?
Universal Containers (UC) is in a legal dispute regarding several orders. UC has found out these records were removed from the system. The VP of Sales has asked to ensure this cannot happen in the future.
Which approach should meet this requirement?