Salesforce Updated MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Exam Questions and Answers by liya

Center for Enablement (C4E) KPIs:

A Center for Enablement (C4E) in MuleSoft focuses on enabling self-service and reuse by providing APIs that can be consumed across the organization. A key metric of success is how many consumers are utilizing the published APIs.

The number of consumers who have requested and received access to an API indicates the level of adoption and reuse, which aligns with the goals of a C4E.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A: This metric could indicate deployment automation, but it is not a direct measure of C4E’s success in enabling API reuse and consumption.

Option B: Bandwidth usage per API implementation provides insight into API traffic but does not measure C4E enablement or consumer engagement.

Option C: The number of developers downloading an API specification can be an indicator of interest but does not confirm actual usage or enablement.

Option D (Correct Answer): The number of consumers who have requested and received access to an API in production is a key metric indicating API adoption and reuse, which aligns with C4E’s goals.

Conclusion:

Option D is the correct answer as it provides a direct measure of consumer engagement and adoption, indicating the success of the C4E in promoting API usage across the organization.

Refer to MuleSoft’s documentation on C4E KPIs and API usage metrics for additional insights.

Explanation

Correct Answer: When a new required field is added to the method called by the API client

*****************************************

>> Generally, the logic on API clients need to be updated when the API contract breaks.

>> When a new method or a child method is added to an API , the API client does not break as it can still continue to use its existing method. So these two options are out.

>> We are left for two more where "datatype of the response if changed" and "a new required field is added".

>> Changing the datatype of the response does break the API contract. However, the question is insisting on the "invocation" logic and not about the response handling logic. The API client can still invoke the API successfully and receive the response but the response will have a different datatype for some field.

>> Adding a new required field will break the API's invocation contract. When adding a new required field, the API contract breaks the RAML or API spec agreement that the API client/API consumer and API provider has between them. So this requires the API client invocation logic to also be updated.

Scenario Overview:

The API resides in Anypoint Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) on CloudHub 1.0, where it requires connectivity to both an AWS-hosted database server and an on-premises web server.

Both servers are isolated from the public internet: the database server is within the customer’s AWS VPC, and the web server is within the customer's on-premises corporate data center.

Connectivity Requirements:

To connect to the AWS database server from the API in Anypoint VPC, VPC peering is ideal. This would allow a private network connection between the MuleSoft Anypoint VPC and the customer’s AWS VPC, enabling secure, direct access to the database.

To connect to the on-premises web server, a VPN tunnel is suitable. This would establish a secure, encrypted connection from the Anypoint VPC to the customer’s corporate data center, allowing secure data flow between the API and the on-premises web server.

Analysis of Options:

Option A (Correct Answer): Setting up VPC peering with AWS VPC enables private network connectivity with the database server, while a VPN tunnel to the on-premises data center allows secure access to the web server. This combination meets the requirements for secure, controlled access to both resources.

Option B: VPC peering alone would not suffice because it does not support a connection from the Anypoint VPC directly to an on-premises network. A VPN is necessary for on-premises access.

Option C: Setting up a transit gateway would provide connectivity within AWS but would not enable direct connectivity from CloudHub to the on-premises network.

Option D: VPC peering with the on-premises network is not possible because VPC peering is typically used to connect two VPCs, not a VPC with an on-premises network.

Conclusion:

Option A is the correct choice, as it provides a complete solution by using VPC peering for AWS VPC connectivity and a VPN tunnel for secure on-premises connectivity. This setup aligns with Anypoint Platform best practices for connecting Anypoint VPCs to both AWS-hosted and on-premises systems, ensuring secure, controlled access to both the database and web server.

For more detailed reference, MuleSoft documentation on Anypoint VPC peering and VPN connectivity provides additional context on best practices for setting up these connections within a hybrid network infrastructure.

Explanation

Correct Answer: Implement required changes to the Process API implementation so that, whenever possible, the Process API’s RAML definition remains unchanged.

*****************************************

Key requirement in the question is:

>> Approach that minimizes the impact of this change on API clients

Based on above:

>> Updating the RAML definition would possibly impact the API clients if the changes require any thing mandatory from client side. So, one should try to avoid doing that until really necessary.

>> Implementing the changes as a completely different API and then redirectly the clients with 3xx status code is really upsetting design and heavily impacts the API clients.

>> Organisations and IT cannot simply postpone the changes required until all API consumers acknowledge they are ready to migrate to a new Process API or API version. This is unrealistic and not possible.

The best way to handle the changes always is to implement required changes to the API implementations so that, whenever possible, the API’s RAML definition remains unchanged.