Pegasystems actualtests pegasystems Pegacplsa88v1 Questions Answers by Dana q170 vce pdf

Page: 11 / 17

Exam Name:	Certified Pega Lead System Architect (CPLSA) Exam 8.8
Exam Code:	PEGACPLSA88V1 Dumps
Vendor:	Pegasystems	Certification:	Certified Lead System Architect (CLSA)
Questions:	238 Q&A's	Shared By:	dana

Question 44

MyCo, a telecom company, developed a new data plan group to suit the needs of its customers. The following table lists the three data plan actions and the criteria that customers must satisfy to qualify for the offer:

Questions 44

How do you configure the engagement policies to implement this requirement? Choose the engagement policy level that is best-suited for each criterion

Questions 44

Options:

Discussion

Answer:

Answer:

Explanation:

Criterion 1: Owns a smart mobile

Engagement Policy Level: Group level

Explanation: The criterion "Owns a smart mobile" applies to all data plans and can be considered a group-level policy. It filters the audience at a broader level to ensure they have a smart mobile device.

Criterion 2:

Under graduation student

Engagement Policy Level: Issue level

Explanation: The criterion "Under graduation student" applies to multiple data plans (1 GB and 3 GB) and is more specific to the issue of targeting educational segments. Thus, it is suitable at the issue level.

Criterion 3:

Post graduation student

Engagement Policy Level: Action level

Explanation: The criterion "Post graduation student" is specific to the 5 GB plan and is most appropriate at the action level. This level ensures the targeting is precise for this particular plan.

New customer

Engagement Policy Level: Group level

Explanation: The criterion "New customer" can be applied across multiple offers and thus is suitable for the group level to broadly target new customers.

Existing customer

Engagement Policy Level: Action level

Explanation: The criterion "Existing customer" is applied at the action level to ensure specific offers (3 GB and 5 GB plans) are appropriately targeted to customers who already have a relationship with the company.

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation with References:

Group Level Engagement Policy:

Conditions that apply broadly across multiple offers or groups of offers fall under group-level policies. Examples include owning a smart mobile and being a new customer.

Issue Level Engagement Policy:

Conditions that are relevant to a specific issue, such as educational status for specific data plans, are categorized under issue-level policies. This ensures that offers targeting undergraduates are consistently managed.

Action Level Engagement Policy:

Conditions that are specific to individual actions or offers are best managed at the action level. This includes targeting post-graduation students for the 5 GB plan and existing customers for specific plans to ensure precise targeting.

References: Pega's best practices for engagement policies recommend using group-level policies for broad criteria, issue-level for segment-specific conditions, and action-level for highly specific targeting to ensure effective and relevant customer engagement.

Question 45

Users in a cloud-based production application report a chronic performance issue that occurs every day between 2:00 P.M. and 4:00 P.M. AH attempts to reproduce the problem in the Development, QA, and Staging environments have failed.

Which two techniques help you troubleshoot the problem? (Choose Two)

Options:

Review Performance Alerts and Exceptions in PDC.

Review a Production Tracer Log using SMA.

Review Alerts and Exceptions using PLA.

Review Performance Alerts and Exceptions in AES.

Discussion

Ivan

I tried these dumps for my recent certification exam and I found it pretty helpful.

Elis Jul 26, 2026

Agree!!! The questions in the dumps were quite similar to what came up in the actual exam. It gave me a good idea of the types of questions to expect and helped me revise efficiently.

Wyatt

Passed my exam… Thank you so much for your excellent Exam Dumps.

Arjun Jul 14, 2026

That sounds really useful. I'll definitely check it out.

Aryan

Absolutely rocked! They are an excellent investment for anyone who wants to pass the exam on the first try. They save you time and effort by providing a comprehensive overview of the exam content, and they give you a competitive edge by giving you access to the latest information. So, I definitely recommend them to new students.

Jessie Jul 11, 2026

did you use PDF or Engine? Which one is most useful?

Honey

I highly recommend it. They made a big difference for me and I'm sure they'll help you too. Just make sure to use them wisely and not solely rely on them. They should be used as a supplement to your regular studies.

Antoni Jul 20, 2026

Good point. Thanks for the advice. I'll definitely keep that in mind.

Question 46

A banking application deals with multiple loan applications and credit card issues in an application based on Pega software, and for customer complaint handling, the bank uses a non-Pega application. A bank representative needs to work on the tasks that come through both apps.

This requirement can be achieved by using multiple approaches, but as an LSA, which one of the following approaches would you suggest?

Options:

Use a remote case type, because it gives a unified view of work on multiple tasks without switching between applications.

Use Pega Process Fabric Hub, because it gives a unified view of work on multiple tasks without switching between applications.

Use a mashup that would render the necessary application screen based on the request type.

Use the DX API, which would render the necessary application screen based on the request type.

Discussion

Question 47

XYZ Corporation wants to ensure that every attempt by a developer to check a rule into a certain ruleset version is reviewed before that rule is allowed to be checked in. The rule should be automatically sent back to the developer without being checked in if all warnings are not justified and the fields on the history tab are not complete.

How do you address this requirement?

Options:

Prior to the first assignment in the ApproveRuleCheckin flow, add a decision shape where one output connector is equivalent to the submitting the SendBack flow action.

Implement a CheckForCustomWarnings activity for each rule included in the requirement. The activity issues a warning whenever the requirement's history tab criteria are not met.

Override the FindReviewers decision tree to invoke a when rule that evaluates the criteria, if the when rule returns true, the decision tree returns SendBack.

Override the SendBack Flow Action adding a pre-ctivity that transfers the assignment to the create operator if the rule's criteria are not met.