Microsoft Updated MB-820 Exam Questions and Answers by harmony

In the context of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, an extension may not appear in the tenant for several reasons, particularly after an upgrade to a new major version.

Option A suggests that the extension was published as a DEV extension, which typically would not cause it to disappear after an upgrade because DEV extensions are intended for development and testing within sandbox environments.

Option B indicates that the extension was not compatible with the new version within 60 days of the first notification. This is a likely reason because Microsoft enforces compatibility rules, and extensions that are not made compatible within the specified timeframe might be removed or disabled.

Option C refers to the extension being published as a PTE (Per-Tenant Extension) and mentions the Platform parameter not being updated. This could cause issues, but not specifically the disappearance of the extension after an upgrade.

Option D expands on Option C by adding that both the Platform and Runtime parameters were not updated in the application file. This is a critical aspect because if these parameters are not correctly set to indicate compatibility with the new version of Business Central, the extension could be disabled or removed.

Option E is similar to Option B but mentions a 90-day period. This option does not align with standard Business Central practices for version compatibility requirements.

Therefore, the two possible reasons for the disappearance of the extension in the tenant after an upgrade are that the extension was not compatible with the new version within the required timeframe (Option B) and that the extension was published as a PTE without the Platform and Runtime parameters being updated (Option D).

Here is the most logical sequence of actions for implementing the Issue Management module in Business Central and exposing the PostIssue method:

Correct Order:

Create a codeunit named "Issue Management Impl." and set the value of Access property to Internal.

This is the first step because Issue Management Impl. is the implementation layer where the actual business logic resides, and setting it to Internal ensures that it is only accessible from within the module, following best practices in encapsulation.

Create a local procedure named PostIssueImpl in the "Issue Management Impl." codeunit.

This step adds the actual PostIssueImpl method, which contains the core logic of posting an issue.

Create a codeunit named "Issue Management" and set the value of Access property to Public.

After defining the implementation logic, you need to create a public-facing Issue Management codeunit to expose the service externally.

Create a PostIssue procedure in the "Issue Management" codeunit, and in it call the PostIssueImpl method.

Lastly, expose the PostIssue method in the Issue Management codeunit, which will internally call the PostIssueImpl method, completing the chain.

In Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, when configuring snapshot debugging, it is crucial that the parameters in the configuration file are correctly set. From the options provided, the issue with the debugger not starting correctly is most likely due to an incorrect "userId" parameter.

Option A is the cause of the problem. The "userId" parameter must be the GUID of the user, not the username. The snapshot debugger needs the exact GUID to attach to the right session for debugging.

Option B is incorrect because "breakOnNext" set to "WebClient" is a valid setting. This tells the debugger to break on the next client action in the web client, which is a typical scenario.

Option C is not the cause of the problem. The "userId" parameter is meant to specify which user session to debug, and this works in conjunction with the "breakOnNext" parameter.

Option D is incorrect as the "executionContext" parameter does not need to be set to "Debug" for snapshot debugging to work. "DebugAndProfile" is a valid value for the "executionContext" parameter, as it allows for debugging and collecting performance information.

Therefore, the reason why the debugger does not start correctly is due to Option A: The "userId" parameter must have the GUID of the user specified, not the username.

In line 12, declare "Job Task" as a variable. = NO

Add the property FieldClass = FlowField; for field 3. = YES

Add the property FieldClass = FlowFilter; for field 3. = NO

In line 23, assign the "User Setup" table to a field. = YES

For "In line 12, declare 'Job Task' as a variable": In the AL code provided, the "Job Task" appears to be part of a CalcFormula of a FlowField, which means it references a table and not a variable. The "Job Task" does not need to be declared as a variable because it is used to reference a table in a CalcFormula expression.

For "Add the property FieldClass = FlowField; for field 3": The line of code CalcFormula = sum("Job Task"."Recognized Sales Amount" where("Job No." = field("No."))); indicates that this field is calculated from other table data, which is the definition of a FlowField. Therefore, adding the property FieldClass = FlowField; is necessary for the field to function correctly.

For "Add the property FieldClass = FlowFilter; for field 3": FlowFilters are used to filter data based on the value in a flow field. Since field 3 is using a CalcFormula to sum values, it is a FlowField and not a FlowFilter. Therefore, this statement is not correct.

For "In line 23, assign the 'User Setup' table to a field": The line TableRelation = "User Setup"; suggests that the "Project Manager" field has a relation to the "User Setup" table, which is a method of assigning a table to a field to ensure that the values in "Project Manager" correspond to values in the "User Setup" table. Hence, this statement is true.