The amount of testing that is considered enough depends on various factors, including the level of risk associated with the application, industry standards, contractual obligations, and specific requirements. It is a risk-based decision that balances the need for thorough testing with time and resource constraints. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 5.2.2.
Question 45
When is testing complete?
Options:
A.
When time and budget are exhausted.
B.
When there is enough information for sponsors to make an informed decision about release.
C.
When there are no remaining high priority defects outstanding.
D.
When every data combination has been exercised successfully.
Sometimes time/money does signify the end of testing, but it is really complete when everything that was set out in advance has been achieved.
Testing is considered complete when sufficient information has been gathered to assess the quality of the software and to make an informed decision about its release. This includes understanding the risks of any remaining defects, the test coverage achieved, and the test results. It is not practical to wait until all possible test cases have been executed or until no defects remain, as these conditions are often impossible to meet within typical project constraints.
[Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0 - Section 1.1, What is Testing?, , ]
Question 46
Which of the following is true of iterative development?
Options:
A.
It uses fully defined specifications from the start.
B.
It involves the users in the testing throughout.
C.
Changes to the system do not need to be formally recorded.
Iterative development involves users in the testing throughout the development process. This approach allows for continuous feedback from users, ensuring that the evolving system meets user requirements and expectations. Unlike the traditional waterfall model, iterative development accommodates changes and improvements based on user feedback, making it suitable for dynamic environments like website development. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 2.1.3.
Josie
I just passed my certification exam using their dumps and I must say, I was thoroughly impressed.
FatimahOct 15, 2025
You’re right. The dumps were authentic and covered all the important topics. I felt confident going into the exam and it paid off.
Everleigh
I must say that they are updated regularly to reflect the latest exam content, so you can be sure that you are getting the most accurate information. Plus, they are easy to use and understand, so even new students can benefit from them.
HuxleyOct 10, 2025
That's great to know. So, you think new students should buy these dumps?
Peyton
Hey guys. Guess what? I passed my exam. Thanks a lot Cramkey, your provided information was relevant and reliable.
CobyOct 17, 2025
Thanks for sharing your experience. I think I'll give Cramkey a try for my next exam.
Sarah
Yeah, I was so relieved when I saw that the question appeared in the exam were similar to their exam dumps. It made the exam a lot easier and I felt confident going into it.
AaliyahOct 22, 2025
Same here. I've heard mixed reviews about using exam dumps, but for us, it definitely paid off.
Question 47
Which statement is most true?
Options:
A.
Different testing is needed depending upon the application.
B.
All software is tested in the same way.
C.
A technique that finds defects will always find defects.
D.
A technique that has found no defects is not useful.
Different types of applications require different testing approaches based on their specific characteristics, risk profiles, and operational environments. For example, testing a financial application would focus heavily on security and accuracy, while testing a mobile game might focusmore on performance and usability. The context-driven nature of software testing recognizes that there is no one-size-fits-all approach, and effective testing must be tailored to the particular application under test.
[Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0 - Section 1.1, What is Testing?, ]
