CIPS Updated L4M3 Exam Questions and Answers by emil

Hank’s pre-contractual assurances may amount to misrepresentation. Remedies for misrepresentation could be rescission of contract or damages. Rescission will be impossible in the following instance:

- Where the innocent party has affirmed the contract; that is, acted in a way confirming that they wish it to continue

- Where the claim has not been brought within a reasonable time (this is a point of general law)

- Where restitution (returning to the pre-contractual position) is impossible (e.g. because the goods have been consumed or have deteriorated)

- Where there has been intervention of innocent third-party (e.g., if the goods have been sold on)

In this case, the subject of contract is designing, building and managing the new CRM system which is impossible to be restituted. Therefore, the contract cannot be rescinded.

Express terms are the terms of the agreement which are expressly agreed between the parties. Ideally, they will be written down in a contract between the parties but where the contract is agreed verbally, they will be the terms discussed and agreed between the parties.

Implied terms are terms implied into the contract by the courts. They are not expressly set out in the contract but are taken to be as effective as if they were and as if they had been included from day one of the contract. The express terms and any implied terms together create the legally binding obligations on the parties.

The types of express terms to be found in a contract are many and varied and will depend on the type of contract. Any term written into the contract is an express term and may refer to price, time scales, warranties and indemnities, limitations on liability, conditions precedent and so on.

An implied term is a term which the courts imply into a contract because it has not been expressly included by the parties. This may be because the parties did not consider it, did not think that any problem would arise in relation to it or simply omitted to include it.

The courts are very reluctant to imply terms into contracts and will only do so in the following circumstances:

1. terms implied under statute

2. terms implied under common law

3. terms implied because of custom or usage

4. terms implied due to previous dealings

5. terms implied ‘in fact’ or to reflect the parties’ intentions

Hire purchase is an arrangement for buying expensive consumer goods, where the buyer makes an initial down payment and pays the balance plus interest in installments. The ownership of the merchandise is not officially transferred to the buyer until all the payments have been made.

Danielle has purchased the car from Aaron, which means its title has been transferred to her. The accident happens before the last instalment is paid. Therefore, the ownership of the car still belongs to Danielle

This scenario is in fact based on a famous case law: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company v New Garage & Motor co [1915] AC 79. In this case law, the House of Lords identified the clause as liquidated damages, and therefore enforceable.

However, if this case had happened in 2015 or afterwards, there would be some legal issues:

- The price agreement is prohibited by Competition Act 1998

- If the agreement is allowed by Competition Act, as in the case Cavendish Square Holding BV (Appellant) v Talal El Makdessi (Respondent), the clause can also be identified as a penalty and it is still enforceable.