Amazon Web Services Updated SAA-C03 Exam Questions and Answers by delia

In compliance mode, a protected object version can't be overwritten or deleted by any user, including the root user in your AWS account. When an object is locked in compliance mode, its retention mode can't be changed, and its retention period can't be shortened. Compliance mode helps ensure that an object version can't be overwritten or deleted for the duration of the retention period. In governance mode, users can't overwrite or delete an object version or alter its lock settings unless they have special permissions. With governance mode, you protect objects against being deleted by most users, but you can still grant some users permission to alter the retention settings or delete the object if necessary. In Governance mode, Objects can be deleted by some users with special permissions, this is against the requirement.

Compliance:

- Object versions can't be overwritten or deleted by any user, including the root user

- Objects retention modes can't be changed, and retention periods can't be shortened

Governance:

- Most users can't overwrite or delete an object version or alter its lock settings

- Some users have special permissions to change the retention or delete the object

Migrate the database to Amazon Aurora MySQL - this will let the DB scale on it's own; it'll scale automatically without needing adjustment. Create AMI of the web app and using a launch template - this will make the creating of any future instances of the app seamless. They can then be added to the auto scaling group which will save them money as it will scale up and down based on demand. Using a spot fleet to launch instances- This solves the "MOST cost-effective" portion of the question as spot instances come at a huge discount at the cost of being terminated at any time Amazon deems fit. I think this is why there's a bit of disagreement on this. While it's the most cost effective, it would be a terrible choice if amazon were to terminate that spot instance during a busy period.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/late st/AuroraUserGuide/Aurora.Replication.html

#Aurora.Replication.Replicas Aurora Replicas have two main purposes. You can issue queries to them to scale the read operations for your application. You typically do so by connecting to the reader endpoint of the cluster. That way, Aurora can spread the load for read-only connections across as many Aurora Replicas as you have in the cluster. Aurora Replicas also help to increase availability. If the writer instance in a cluster becomes unavailable, Aurora automatically promotes one of the reader instances to take its place as the new writer.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Amazon RDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/Aurora.Overview.html

1. lowest possible latency + node to node ==> cluster placement(must be within one AZ), so C, D out

2. For EBS Multi-Attach, up to 16 instances can be attached to a single volume==>we have 16 linux instance==>more close to A

3. "need a shared block device volume"==>EBS Multi-attach is Block Storage whereas EFS is File Storage==> B out

4. EFS automatically replicates data within and across 3 AZ==>we use cluster placement so all EC2 are within one AZ.

5. EBS Multi-attach volumes can be used for clients within a single AZ.

https://repost.aws/questions/QUK2RANw1QTKCwpDUwCCI72A/efs-vs-ebs-mult-attach