ACAMS Updated CAMS Exam Questions and Answers by gurbaaz

Section 319(a) of the USA PATRIOT Actenhancesregulatory oversight of foreign financial institutions with U.S. correspondent accounts.

Option A (Correct):This section requires foreign banks to provide relevant AML records within 120 hours upon request from a U.S. regulatory agency.

Option B (Incorrect):This describes Section 311, which deals with special measures against foreign jurisdictions or financial institutions.

Option C (Incorrect):This is covered under Section 319(b), which permits asset seizures from U.S. correspondent accounts.

Option D (Incorrect):This relates to Section 312, which mandates due diligence on foreign correspondent accounts and private banking.

Best Practices for Compliance with Section 319(a):

Ensure the ability to produce AML-related records within 120 hours.

Establish clear communication channels between correspondent banks.

Monitor foreign financial institution relationships for compliance risks.

FIUs act as central hubs for financial crime intelligence, receiving and analyzingSuspicious Activity Reports (SARs)and other data to support law enforcement.

Option A (Correct):FIUscollect, analyze, and disseminate financial intelligencerelated tomoney laundering and terrorist financing.

Option B (Incorrect):FIUsdo not prosecute cases—they refer cases tolaw enforcement agenciesfor prosecution.

Option C (Incorrect):FIUs analyze financial crime data butdo not develop surveillance technology.

Option D (Incorrect):FIUs share intelligencewith law enforcement and regulatory bodies, not directly with private companies.

Types of FIUs and Their Roles:

A screenshot of a web page Description automatically generated

Key FIU Responsibilities:

Collect Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs)from financial institutions.

Analyze financial transactionsto identify money laundering patterns.

Disseminate intelligence to law enforcement and regulatory authorities.

 A beneficial owner is the natural person who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity or arrangement, such as a company, a trust, or a foundation. Identifying the beneficial owner is essential for preventing and detecting money laundering, terrorist financing, tax evasion, and other illicit activities that may involve the misuse of corporate vehicles. However, some individuals or entities may attempt to conceal the true beneficial ownership of a company by using various techniques, such as complex ownership structures, shell companies, bearer shares, or nominees. A nominee is a person or an entity that acts on behalf of another person or entity, usually for a fee or a commission, without disclosing the identity of the real owner or controller. Nominees can be used to protect or conceal the identity of the beneficial owner and controller of a company or asset. A nominee can help overcome jurisdictional controls on company ownership and circumvent directorship bans imposed by courts and government authorities. While the appointment of nominees is lawful in most countries, the use of nominees for money laundering purposes is illegal and a red flag for suspicious activity. Therefore, the person filling out an application on the company’s behalf indicating that a beneficial owner is a nominee for another person not named in the company’s documentation is an indicator that there is an attempt to conceal the company’s true beneficial ownership12.

The other options are not necessarily indicators of concealment of beneficial ownership, as they may have legitimate explanations or reasons. The company having a subsidiary in another jurisdiction with a local investor as a beneficial owner may be a normal business practice or a strategic decision, as long as the ownership information is transparent and accurate. Recent changes to the company’s ownership structure may reflect the company’s growth, development, or adaptation to market conditions, as long as they are documented and reported to the relevant authorities. Beneficial ownership information from the time that the company was formed several years ago not matching the current information may be due to natural changes in the company’s shareholders, directors, or managers, as long as they are updated and verified periodically.

A. Offering internal policies training: This is crucial. Employees need to understand the specific procedures and policies related to customer identification and verification. These internal policies ensure consistency and compliance.

B. Offering general background and history training: While historical context is valuable, it’s not the primary focus. AML training should prioritize practical knowledge and current best practices.

C. Offering periodic refresher training: Absolutely! Regular refresher training keeps employees up-to-date with evolving AML regulations and reinforces their understanding.

D. Offering tailored training for specific roles: This is essential. Different roles require different expertise. For example, investigators need to recognize red flags, while report writers must understand how to create effective suspicious activity reports.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Internal Policies Training: AML training should cover internal policies thoroughly. This includes customer identification and verification procedures, as well as other relevant policies specific to the organization. Employees need to understand how these policies translate into day-to-day practices.

General Background and History: While historical context can be interesting, it’s not the primary focus of AML training. Instead, the emphasis should be on practical knowledge, current best practices, and real-world scenarios.

Periodic Refresher Training: Regular refresher training is essential. AML regulations evolve, and employees need to stay informed. Annual or periodic refreshers reinforce knowledge and ensure compliance.

Tailored Training for Specific Roles: Different roles within an organization have distinct responsibilities related to AML. Tailored training ensures that employees understand their specific duties. For example, investigators need to recognize suspicious patterns, while report writers must know how to create effective reports.